Sonu Goel1, Deepak Sharma, Amarjeet Singh. 1. Assistant Professor of Health Management, School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: With the mandate of the Indian Government to improve health services for the population, improving patients' satisfaction with outpatient department (OPD) services is vital. Many scales developed in Western societies to assess patient satisfaction may not be appropriate to the Indian health care system. The aim of this study was to develop and conduct initial psychometric testing of a satisfaction questionnaire for patients attending OPDs in North India. METHODS: The North India Outpatient Department Satisfaction Scale (NIOPDSS) was initially constructed based on a Delphi consensus among experts. After pretesting on a small number of patients, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among 942 outpatients in Chandigarh, North India. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire in terms of content validity, construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity, and reliability were assessed. RESULTS: Eighty items were generated from the Delphi exercise. After assessing the content validity, data quality and construct validity of the questionnaire, a final instrument with 17 items representing six dimensions of patient satisfaction was developed. The internal consistency ranged from 0.72 to 0.93 and intra-class correlation coefficient ranged from 0.52 to 0.80. CONCLUSION: NIOPDSS appears to be a reliable and valid measure of patient satisfaction for patients attending OPDs in North India. Further research should be carried out with different outpatient populations to assess the wider performance of the questionnaire.
OBJECTIVES: With the mandate of the Indian Government to improve health services for the population, improving patients' satisfaction with outpatient department (OPD) services is vital. Many scales developed in Western societies to assess patient satisfaction may not be appropriate to the Indian health care system. The aim of this study was to develop and conduct initial psychometric testing of a satisfaction questionnaire for patients attending OPDs in North India. METHODS: The North India Outpatient Department Satisfaction Scale (NIOPDSS) was initially constructed based on a Delphi consensus among experts. After pretesting on a small number of patients, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among 942 outpatients in Chandigarh, North India. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire in terms of content validity, construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity, and reliability were assessed. RESULTS: Eighty items were generated from the Delphi exercise. After assessing the content validity, data quality and construct validity of the questionnaire, a final instrument with 17 items representing six dimensions of patient satisfaction was developed. The internal consistency ranged from 0.72 to 0.93 and intra-class correlation coefficient ranged from 0.52 to 0.80. CONCLUSION: NIOPDSS appears to be a reliable and valid measure of patient satisfaction for patients attending OPDs in North India. Further research should be carried out with different outpatient populations to assess the wider performance of the questionnaire.
Authors: Sarahi Estrella Maldonado-Paredes; Teresa Juárez-Cedillo; Jorge Escobedo de la Peña; Miguel Angel Vaca-Marín; Carolina Quiñones-Villalobos; Osvaldo Garrido-Acosta; Roberto C González-Meléndez Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2022-05-14
Authors: Kory S London; Bonita Singal; Jennifer Fowler; Rebecca Prepejchal; Stefanie Simmons; Douglas Finefrock Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2015-12-11
Authors: Jongnam Hwang; Giang Thu Vu; Bach Xuan Tran; Thu Hong Thi Nguyen; Bang Van Nguyen; Long Hoang Nguyen; Huong Lan Thi Nguyen; Carl A Latkin; Cyrus S H Ho; Roger C M Ho Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Uwe Konerding; Tom Bowen; Sylvia G Elkhuizen; Raquel Faubel; Paul Forte; Eleftheria Karampli; Tomi Malmström; Elpida Pavi; Paulus Torkki Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 3.240