Literature DB >> 24170006

Power of two and three-generation QTL mapping experiments in an outbred population containing full-sib or half-sib families.

S van der Beek1, J A van Arendonk, A F Groen.   

Abstract

QTL mapping experiments involve many animals to be genotyped and performance tested. Consequently, experimental designs need to be optimized to minimize the costs of data collection and genotyping. The present study has analyzed the power and efficiency of experiments with two or three-generation family structures containing full-sib families, half-sib families, or both. The focus was on data from one outbred population because the main interest is to locate genes that can be used for within-line selection. For a two generation experiment more animals had to be typed for marker loci to obtain a certain power than for a three generation experiment. Fewer trait values, however, had to be obtained for a two-generation experiment than for a three-generation experiment. A two or three-generation family structure with full-sib offspring was more efficient than a two or three-generation family structure with half-sib offspring. A family structure with full-sib grand-offspring, however, was less efficient than a family structure with half-sib grand-offspring. For the most efficient family structure each pair of parents had full-sib offspring that were genotyped for the marker. For the most-efficient family structure each full-sib offspring had half-sib grand-offspring for which trait values were obtained. For equal power with a heritability of 0.1 and 100 grand-offspring per full-sib offspring, 30-times less marker typings were required for this most efficient family structure than for a two-generation half-sib structure in which marker genotypes and trait values were obtained for half-sib offspring. The effect of heritability and the type of analysis (single marker or interval analysis) on the efficiency of a family structure is described. The results of this study should help to design QTL mapping experiments in an outbred population.

Year:  1995        PMID: 24170006     DOI: 10.1007/BF00223929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  17 in total

1.  Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers.

Authors:  C W Stuber; S E Lincoln; D W Wolff; T Helentjaris; E S Lander
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Use of deterministic sampling for exploring likelihoods in linkage analysis for quantitative traits.

Authors:  M J Mackinnon; S van der Beek; B P Kinghorn
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps.

Authors:  E S Lander; D Botstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Investigations on inheritance of quantitative characters in animals by gene markers I. Methods.

Authors:  H Geldermann
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Theoretical basis for separation of multiple linked gene effects in mapping quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  Z B Zeng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A microsatellite linkage map of the porcine genome.

Authors:  G A Rohrer; L J Alexander; J W Keele; T P Smith; C W Beattie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  High resolution of quantitative traits into multiple loci via interval mapping.

Authors:  R C Jansen; P Stam
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Power of daughter and granddaughter designs for determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in dairy cattle.

Authors:  J I Weller; Y Kashi; M Soller
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production in dairy cattle by exploiting progeny testing.

Authors:  M Georges; D Nielsen; M Mackinnon; A Mishra; R Okimoto; A T Pasquino; L S Sargeant; A Sorensen; M R Steele; X Zhao
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigs.

Authors:  L Andersson; C S Haley; H Ellegren; S A Knott; M Johansson; K Andersson; L Andersson-Eklund; I Edfors-Lilja; M Fredholm; I Hansson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-03-25       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  1 in total

1.  Association mapping in outbred populations: power and efficiency when genotyping parents and phenotyping progeny.

Authors:  Stephen F Chenoweth; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.