Literature DB >> 24169670

Mapping dominant markers using F2 matings.

S J Knapp1, J L Holloway, W C Bridges, B H Liu.   

Abstract

The development of efficient methods for amplifying random DNA sequences by the polymerase chain reaction has created the basis for mapping virtually unlimited numbers of mixed-phase dominant DNA markers in one population. Although dominant markers can be efficiently mapped using many different kinds of matings, recombination frequencies and locus orders are often mis-estimated from repulsion F2 matings. The major problem with these matings, apart from excessive sampling errors of recombination frequency (θ) estimates, is the bias of the maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE) of θ (θ ML). [Formula: see text] when the observed frequency of double-recessive phenotypes is 0 and the observed frequency of double-dominant phenotypes is less than 2/3 - the bias for those samples is - θ. We used simulation to estimate the mean bias of θ ML. Mean bias is a function of n and θ and decreases as n increases. Valid maps of dominant markers can be built by using sub-sets of markers linked in coupling, thereby creating male and feamle coupling maps, as long as the maps are fairly dense (about 5 cM) - the sampling errors of θ increase as θ increases for coupling linkages and are equal to those for backcross matings when θ=0. The use of F2 matings for mapping dominant markers is not necessarily proscribed because they yield twice as many useful markers as a backcross population, albeit in two maps, for the same number of DNA extractions and PCR assays; however, dominant markers can be more effeciently exploited by using doubled-haploid, recombinant-inbred, or other inbred populations.

Year:  1995        PMID: 24169670     DOI: 10.1007/BF00220861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  6 in total

1.  Monte Carlo comparison of preliminary methods for ordering multiple genetic loci.

Authors:  J M Olson; M Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers.

Authors:  J G Williams; A R Kubelik; K J Livak; J A Rafalski; S V Tingey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Genetic diagnostics in plant breeding: RAPDs, microsatellites and machines.

Authors:  J A Rafalski; S V Tingey
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Bias of the estimated recombination fraction and lod score due to an association between a disease gene and a marker gene.

Authors:  F Clerget-Darpoux
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  Reduction of bias in estimating the frequency of recessive genes.

Authors:  C A Huether; E A Murphy
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers.

Authors:  J Welsh; M McClelland
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-12-25       Impact factor: 16.971

  6 in total
  16 in total

1.  Identification of AFLP and STS markers closely linked to the def locus in pea.

Authors:  M von Stackelberg; S Lindemann; M Menke; S Riesselmann; H-J Jacobsen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Efficient multipoint mapping: making use of dominant repulsion-phase markers.

Authors:  D I Mester; Y I Ronin; Y Hu; J Peng; E Nevo; A B Korol
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  QTL analysis of intraspecific differences between two Silene vulgaris ecotypes.

Authors:  Martin Bratteler; Matthias Baltisberger; Alex Widmer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Construction of linkage maps in full-sib families of diploid outbreeding species by minimizing the number of recombinations in hidden inheritance vectors.

Authors:  J Jansen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A new strategy for estimating recombination fractions between dominant markers from an F2 population.

Authors:  Yuan-De Tan; Yun-Xin Fu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic architecture of factors underlying partial resistance to Alternaria leaf blight in carrot.

Authors:  Valérie Le Clerc; Anna Pawelec; Christelle Birolleau-Touchard; Anita Suel; Mathilde Briard
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Genetic analysis using trans-dominant linked markers in an F2 family.

Authors:  C Plomion; B H Liu; D M O'Malley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Stochastic deletion-insertion algorithm to construct dense linkage maps.

Authors:  Jixiang Wu; Xiang-Yang Lou; Michael Gonda
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 0.582

9.  High-throughput identification of genetic markers using representational oligonucleotide microarray analysis.

Authors:  Cornelia Lange; Lukas Mittermayr; Juliane C Dohm; Daniela Holtgräwe; Bernd Weisshaar; Heinz Himmelbauer
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Genetic linkage mapping of an annual x perennial ryegrass population.

Authors:  S E Warnke; R E Barker; Geunhwa Jung; Sung-Chur Sim; M A Rouf Mian; M C Saha; L A Brilman; M P Dupal; J W Forster
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.