Literature DB >> 24169514

Comparison of two poultry litter qPCR assays targeting the 16S rRNA gene of Brevibacterium sp.

Hodon Ryu1, Michael Elk, Izhar U H Khan, Valerie J Harwood, Marirosa Molina, Thomas A Edge, Jorge Santo Domingo.   

Abstract

Chicken feces commonly contain human pathogens and are also important sources of fecal pollution in environmental waters. Consequently, methods that can detect chicken fecal pollution are needed in public health and environmental monitoring studies. In this study, we compared a previously developed SYBR green qPCR assay (LA35) to a novel TaqMan qPCR assay (CL) for the environmental detection of poultry-associated fecal pollution. We tested both assays against chicken litter (n = 40), chicken fecal samples (n = 186), non-chicken fecal sources (n = 484), and environmental water samples (n = 323). Most chicken litter samples (i.e., ≥ 98%) were positive for both assays with relatively high signal intensities, whereas only 23% and 12% of poultry fecal samples (n = 186) were positive with the LA35 and the CL assays, respectively. Data using fecal samples from non-target animal species showed that the assays are highly host-associated (≥ 95%). Bayesian statistical models showed that the two assays are associated with relatively low probability of false-positive and false-negative signals in water samples. The CL marker had a lower prevalence than the LA35 assay when tested against environmental water samples (i.e., 21% vs. 31% positive signals). However, by combining the results from the two assays the detection levels increased to 41%, suggesting that using multiple assays can improve the detection of chicken-fecal pollution in environmental waters.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fecal pollution; Microbial source tracking; Poultry-associated assays; qPCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24169514     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

1.  LA35 Poultry Fecal Marker Persistence Is Correlated with That of Indicators and Pathogens in Environmental Waters.

Authors:  Bina Nayak; Jennifer Weidhaas; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.005

2.  Temporal Relationships Exist Between Cecum, Ileum, and Litter Bacterial Microbiomes in a Commercial Turkey Flock, and Subtherapeutic Penicillin Treatment Impacts Ileum Bacterial Community Establishment.

Authors:  Jessica L Danzeisen; Jonathan B Clayton; Hu Huang; Dan Knights; Brian McComb; Shivdeep S Hayer; Timothy J Johnson
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2015-11-20

3.  The Development of a Novel qPCR Assay-Set for Identifying Fecal Contamination Originating from Domestic Fowls and Waterfowl in Israel.

Authors:  Shoshanit Ohad; Shifra Ben-Dor; Jaime Prilusky; Valeria Kravitz; Bareket Dassa; Vered Chalifa-Caspi; Yechezkel Kashi; Efrat Rorman
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Multiparametric monitoring of microbial faecal pollution reveals the dominance of human contamination along the whole Danube River.

Authors:  A K T Kirschner; G H Reischer; S Jakwerth; D Savio; S Ixenmaier; E Toth; R Sommer; R L Mach; R Linke; A Eiler; S Kolarevic; A H Farnleitner
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Quantitative detection of fecal contamination with domestic poultry feces in environments in China.

Authors:  Fang-Fang Zhuang; Hu Li; Xin-Yuan Zhou; Yong-Guan Zhu; Jian-Qiang Su
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.298

6.  Validation of microbial source tracking markers for the attribution of fecal contamination in indoor-household environments of the Peruvian Amazon.

Authors:  Francesca Schiaffino; Nora Pisanic; Josh M Colston; Dixner Rengifo; Maribel Paredes Olortegui; Valentino Shapiama; Pablo Peñataro Yori; Christopher D Heaney; Meghan F Davis; Margaret N Kosek
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 7.963

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.