Literature DB >> 24169081

Effects of tadalafil treatment on erectile function recovery following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a randomised placebo-controlled study (REACTT).

Francesco Montorsi1, Gerald Brock2, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg3, John Mulhall4, Ignacio Moncada5, Hitendra R H Patel6, Daniel Chevallier7, Kazimierz Krajka8, Carsten Henneges9, Ruth Dickson10, Hartwig Büttner11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The potential rehabilitative and protective effect of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) on penile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP) remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of tadalafil 5mg once daily and tadalafil 20mg on demand versus placebo taken over 9 mo in improving unassisted erectile function (EF) following NSRP, as measured by the proportion of patients achieving an International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF) score ≥ 22 after 6-wk drug-free washout (DFW). Secondary measures included IIEF-EF, Sexual Encounter Profile question 3 (SEP-3), and penile length. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial in men ≤ 68 yr of age with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (Gleason ≤ 7) and normal preoperative EF who underwent NSRP at 50 centres from nine European countries and Canada.
INTERVENTIONS: 1:1:1 randomisation to 9 mo of treatment with tadalafil 5mg once daily, tadalafil 20mg on demand, or placebo followed by a 6-wk DFW and 3-mo open-label tadalafil once daily (all patients). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Logistic regression, mixed-effects model for repeated measures, and analysis of covariance, adjusting for treatment, age, and country, were applied to IIEF-EF scores ≥ 22, SEP-3, and penile length. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Four hundred twenty-three patients were randomised to tadalafil once daily (n=139), on demand (n=143), and placebo (n=141). The mean age was 57.9 yr of age (standard deviation: 5.58 yr); 20.9%, 16.9%, and 19.1% of patients in the tadalafil once daily, on demand, and placebo groups, respectively, achieved IIEF EF scores ≥ 22 after DFW; odds ratios for tadalafil once daily and on demand versus placebo were 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-2.1; p=0.675) and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.7; p=0.704). At the end of double-blind treatment (EDT), least squares (LS) mean IIEF-EF score improvement significantly exceeded the minimally clinically important difference (MCID: ΔIIEF-EF ≥ 4) in both tadalafil groups; for SEP-3 (MCID ≥ 23%), this was the case for tadalafil once daily only. Treatment effects versus placebo were significant for tadalafil once daily only (IIEF-EF: p=0.016; SEP-3: p=0.019). In all groups, IIEF-EF and SEP-3 decreased during DFW but continued to improve during open-label treatment. At month 9 (EDT), penile length loss was significantly reduced versus placebo in the tadalafil once daily group only (LS mean difference 4.1mm; 95% CI, 0.4-7.8; p=0.032).
CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil once daily was most effective on drug-assisted EF in men with erectile dysfunction following NSRP, and data suggest a potential role for tadalafil once daily provided early after surgery in contributing to the recovery of EF after prostatectomy and possibly protecting from penile structural changes. Unassisted EF was not improved after cessation of active therapy for 9 mo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01026818.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Erectile dysfunction; Nerve-sparing prostatectomy; Penile function; Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Rehabilitation; Tadalafil once a day

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24169081     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  74 in total

Review 1.  Role of regenerative therapies on erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  S T Hansen; M Lund; L D Ostergaard; L Lund
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 2.  Cavernous smooth muscles: innovative potential therapies are promising for an unrevealed clinical diagnosis.

Authors:  Ahmed Mohamed Hassanin; Ahmed Zain Abdel-Hamid
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Temporal changes in neurotrophic factors and neurite outgrowth in the major pelvic ganglion following cavernous nerve injury.

Authors:  Johanna L Hannan; Maarten Albersen; Bernard L Stopak; Xiaopu Liu; Arthur L Burnett; Ahmet Hoke; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 4.  Erectile function post robotic radical prostatectomy: technical tips to improve outcomes?

Authors:  S S Goonewardene; R Persad; D Gillatt
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-07

Review 5.  [Laparascopic radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  R Ganzer; M Do; B P Rai; A Dietel; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Highlights of the university of toronto urology update 2014.

Authors:  Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Perplexity of penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan Clavell-Hernandez; Bahadır Ermeç; Ateş Kadıoğlu; Run Wang
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-01-22

Review 8.  Focusing on sexual rehabilitation besides penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy is important.

Authors:  Daphné Vanderhaeghe; Maarten Albersen; Emmanuel Weyne
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 9.  Psychological Impacts of Male Sexual Dysfunction in Pelvic Cancer Survivorship.

Authors:  David K Twitchell; Daniela A Wittmann; James M Hotaling; Alexander W Pastuszak
Journal:  Sex Med Rev       Date:  2019-03-26

Review 10.  Erection rehabilitation following prostatectomy--current strategies and future directions.

Authors:  Nikolai A Sopko; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.