Literature DB >> 24169014

Usefulness of echocardiographically guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intermediate QRS width and non-left bundle branch block morphology.

Josef J Marek1, Samir Saba1, Tetsuari Onishi1, Keiko Ryo1, David Schwartzman1, Evan C Adelstein1, John Gorcsan2.   

Abstract

The current guidelines most strongly support cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for patients with heart failure with a QRS width of ≥150 ms and left bundle branch block (LBBB). Our objective was to assess the potential benefit of echocardiographically guided left ventricular (LV) lead positioning for patients with a QRS width <150 ms or non-LBBB as a substudy of the Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region (STARTER) prospective, randomized controlled trial. The STARTER trial randomized 187 patients with heart failure, a QRS of ≥120 ms, and ejection fraction of ≤35% to LV lead guided to the site of latest mechanical activation by speckle tracking radial strain versus routine implantation. The predefined primary end point was heart failure hospitalization or death within 2 years. This substudy included 151 CRT patients with matching echocardiographic and LV lead position data and complete follow-up data. Patients with a QRS width of 120 to 149 ms or non-LBBB and LV lead concordant or adjacent to the site of latest mechanical activation had favorable outcomes after CRT similar to those with LBBB or a QRS width of ≥150 ms. In contrast, patients with a QRS of 120 to 149 ms or non-LBBB and remote LV leads had unfavorable outcomes (hazard ratio 5.45, 95% confidence interval 2.36 to 12.6, p <0.001, and hazard ratio 4.92, 95% confidence interval 2.12 to 11.39, p <0.001, respectively, with significant interaction after adjusting for baseline variables, p = 0.038 and p = 0.008). In conclusion, LV lead positioning with respect to the echocardiographic site of latest activation was significantly associated with more favorable clinical outcomes in patients with a QRS duration <150 ms and/or non-LBBB. Additional prospective study is warranted.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24169014     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Influence of QRS duration on outcome of death or appropriate defibrillator therapy by strategy of left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients.

Authors:  Samir Saba; Josef Marek; Mian Bilal Alam; Evan Adelstein; David Schwartzman; Sandeep Jain; John Gorcsan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Donato Mele; Matteo Bertini; Michele Malagù; Marianna Nardozza; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 3.  Pre-Implant Assessment For Optimal LV Lead Placement In CRT: ECG, ECHO, or MRI?

Authors:  Matthew J Singleton; David D Spragg
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-08-31

Review 4.  Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kevin Vernooy; Caroline J M van Deursen; Marc Strik; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Image-guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Jin; Qi Zhang; Jia-Liang Mao; Ben He
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using left ventricular pacing lead position and cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived wall motion patterns: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gregory R Hartlage; Jonathan D Suever; Stephanie Clement-Guinaudeau; Patrick T Strickland; Nima Ghasemzadeh; R Patrick Magrath; Ankit Parikh; Stamatios Lerakis; Michael H Hoskins; Angel R Leon; Michael S Lloyd; John N Oshinski
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  The role of electrocardiography in the elaboration of a new paradigm in cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance.

Authors:  András Vereckei; Gábor Katona; Zsuzsanna Szelényi; Gábor Szénási; Bálint Kozman; István Karádi
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Evolving concept of dyssynchrony and its utility.

Authors:  Priyanka Satish; Bharat Narasimhan; Andreas Hagendorff; Bhupendar Tayal
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Novel electrocardiographic dyssynchrony criteria that may improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Gábor Katona; András Vereckei
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.327

10.  A different cardiac resynchronization therapy technique might be needed in some patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance pattern.

Authors:  Gábor Katona; Zsuzsanna Szelényi; Gábor Szénási; Bálint Kozman; Zsolt Rekvényi; Luca Kópházi; Zsolt Dobos; Szilvia Vereckei; András Vereckei
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.327

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.