CONTEXT: Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is one of the most frequently inactivated tumor suppressor genes in sporadic cancers. Somatic mutations of PTEN occur in many tumors including those of the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary tracts. Loss of PTEN expression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma, gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. OBJECTIVE: To study the expression of PTEN and its significance in ampullary adenocarcinoma (AA). DESIGN: We constructed tissue microarrays by using archival tissue from 92 patients (55 males, 37 females; median age, 63 years; age range, 37 to 87 years) with previously untreated AA who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at our institution. PTEN expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, scored semiquantitatively (based on staining intensity and percentage positive tumor cells), and correlated with clinicopathologic features and survival. RESULTS: Of 92 cases, 23 (25.0%) were PTEN negative. Loss of PTEN expression correlated with lymph node metastasis (P = .004), advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (P = .02), and higher frequency of recurrence (P = .03). Patients with PTEN-negative tumors had shorter disease-free survival (DFS, mean: 89.0 ± 20.8 months) and overall survival (OS, mean: 93.1 ± 19.1 months) than those with PTEN-positive tumors (DFS, mean: 161.4 ± 11.7 months, P = .01; OS, mean: 175.4 ± 11.0 months, P = .001). In multivariate analyses, PTEN expression was a prognostic factor for both DFS and OS, independent of AJCC stage, lymph node status, pathologic tumor (pT) stage, and differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of PTEN expression is associated with poor DFS and OS in patients with AA after curative surgery. PTEN expression may be used as a prognostic marker for patients with resected AA.
CONTEXT: Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is one of the most frequently inactivated tumor suppressor genes in sporadic cancers. Somatic mutations of PTEN occur in many tumors including those of the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary tracts. Loss of PTEN expression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma, gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. OBJECTIVE: To study the expression of PTEN and its significance in ampullary adenocarcinoma (AA). DESIGN: We constructed tissue microarrays by using archival tissue from 92 patients (55 males, 37 females; median age, 63 years; age range, 37 to 87 years) with previously untreated AA who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at our institution. PTEN expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, scored semiquantitatively (based on staining intensity and percentage positive tumor cells), and correlated with clinicopathologic features and survival. RESULTS: Of 92 cases, 23 (25.0%) were PTEN negative. Loss of PTEN expression correlated with lymph node metastasis (P = .004), advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (P = .02), and higher frequency of recurrence (P = .03). Patients with PTEN-negative tumors had shorter disease-free survival (DFS, mean: 89.0 ± 20.8 months) and overall survival (OS, mean: 93.1 ± 19.1 months) than those with PTEN-positive tumors (DFS, mean: 161.4 ± 11.7 months, P = .01; OS, mean: 175.4 ± 11.0 months, P = .001). In multivariate analyses, PTEN expression was a prognostic factor for both DFS and OS, independent of AJCC stage, lymph node status, pathologic tumor (pT) stage, and differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of PTEN expression is associated with poor DFS and OS in patients with AA after curative surgery. PTEN expression may be used as a prognostic marker for patients with resected AA.
Authors: Jeannelyn S Estrella; Asif Rashid; Jason B Fleming; Matthew H Katz; Jeffrey E Lee; Robert A Wolf; Gauri R Varadhachary; Peter W T Pisters; Eddie K Abdalla; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Hua Wang; Henry F Gomez; Douglas B Evans; James L Abbruzzese; Huamin Wang Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: M Moehler; A Mueller; T Trarbach; F Lordick; T Seufferlein; S Kubicka; M Geißler; S Schwarz; P R Galle; S Kanzler Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: P Athanassiadou; P Athanassiades; D Grapsa; M Gonidi; A M Athanassiadou; P N Stamati; E Patsouris Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Serdar Balci; Olca Basturk; Burcu Saka; Pelin Bagci; Lauren M Postlewait; Takuma Tajiri; Kee-Taek Jang; Nobuyuki Ohike; Grace E Kim; Alyssa Krasinskas; Hyejeong Choi; Juan M Sarmiento; David A Kooby; Bassel F El-Rayes; Jessica H Knight; Michael Goodman; Gizem Akkas; Michelle D Reid; Shishir K Maithel; Volkan Adsay Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Sylvester N Osayi; Mark Bloomston; Carl M Schmidt; E Christopher Ellison; Peter Muscarella Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Scott Kopetz; Jayesh Desai; Emily Chan; Joel Randolph Hecht; Peter J O'Dwyer; Dipen Maru; Van Morris; Filip Janku; Arvind Dasari; Woonbook Chung; Jean-Pierre J Issa; Peter Gibbs; Brian James; Garth Powis; Keith B Nolop; Suman Bhattacharya; Leonard Saltz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 44.544