Literature DB >> 24167766

The "spin" doctors.

Ranjani R Starr1, Tonya Lowery St John, Michael J Meagher.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 24167766      PMCID： PMC3796781     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health        ISSN： 2165-8242


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Chocolate consumption, cognitive function, and Nobel laureates.

Authors:  Franz H Messerli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of "spin".

Authors:  Eleanor A Ochodo; Margriet C de Haan; Johannes B Reitsma; Lotty Hooft; Patrick M Bossuyt; Mariska M G Leeflang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Spin in radiology research: let the data speak for themselves.

Authors:  Deborah Levine; Alexander A Bankier; Herbert Y Kressel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Does chocolate consumption really boost Nobel Award chances? The peril of over-interpreting correlations in health studies.

Authors:  Pierre Maurage; Alexandre Heeren; Mauro Pesenti
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 5.  Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Cipriani; Toshiaki A Furukawa; Georgia Salanti; John R Geddes; Julian Pt Higgins; Rachel Churchill; Norio Watanabe; Atsuo Nakagawa; Ichiro M Omori; Hugh McGuire; Michele Tansella; Corrado Barbui
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Marcello Di Nisio; Nynke Smidt; Jeroen C van Rijn; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Efficacy of new generation antidepressants: differences seem illusory.

Authors:  A C Del Re; Glen I Spielmans; Christoph Flückiger; Bruce E Wampold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.

Authors:  Kerry Dwan; Douglas G Altman; Juan A Arnaiz; Jill Bloom; An-Wen Chan; Eugenia Cronin; Evelyne Decullier; Philippa J Easterbrook; Erik Von Elm; Carrol Gamble; Davina Ghersi; John P A Ioannidis; John Simes; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: review of publication and presentation.

Authors:  Kristin Rising; Peter Bacchetti; Lisa Bero
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 11.069
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.