| Literature DB >> 24167753 |
Bandana Sharma1, Neetu Singh, Neena Gupta, Pavika Lal, Shefali Pande, Shashi Chauhan.
Abstract
Objectives. To evaluate the role of angiogenesis tumor marker CD31 in the detection of precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions and to compare its efficacy with colposcopy and histopathology. Materials and Methods. 230 patients with a suspicious looking cervix and an abnormal Pap smear attending the Outpatient Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of GSVM Medical College were subjected to a colposcopic examination. 180 patients with suspected colposcopic findings were subjected to a colposcopic directed biopsy. Biopsy tissues were sent for histopathological examination out of which 50 biopsied samples were sent for immunostaining of CD-31. Statistical analysis was done. Results. Comparison of microvessel density (MVD) count by haematoxylin and eosin staining (HE) and immunostaining of CD31 in preinvasive group were 4.012 ± 2.57 and 5.44 ± 2.21, respectively, and in invasive group were 9.18 ± 2.32 and 12.82 ± 4.07, respectively, which showed that MVD was higher by CD31 both in preinvasive and invasive group, and it was statistically significant. Conclusion. Angiogenesis is a marker of tumor progression, and CD31 fixes up vessel better as compared to HE, so aggressiveness of the tumor can be better predicted by MVD-CD31 as compared to MVD-HE.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24167753 PMCID: PMC3791664 DOI: 10.1155/2013/243168
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Patholog Res Int ISSN: 2042-003X
Sociodemographic characteristics of the study population.
| Histopathological findings | Age (mean ± SD) | Parity (number) | Socioeconomic status (number) | Age at first coitus (number) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Low | Middle | High | 10–20 yrs | 21–30 yrs | >30 yrs | ||
| Normal | 27.71 ± 5.44 | 17 | 27 | 23 | 03 | 21 | 36 | 13 | 04 | 64 | 02 |
| Inflammatory | 28.37 ± 5.74 | 7 | 28 | 26 | 02 | 27 | 25 | 11 | 03 | 59 | 01 |
| CIN-I | 36.67 ± 7.20 | — | 19 | 21 | 20 | 30 | 21 | 09 | 35 | 25 | — |
| CIN-II | 39.33 ± 6.39 | — | 08 | 07 | 15 | 17 | 09 | 04 | 28 | 02 | — |
| CIN-III | 46.39 ± 5.33 | — | 03 | 03 | 10 | 11 | 05 | — | 16 | — | — |
| Carcinoma | — | — | — | 11 | 09 | 02 | — | 11 | — | — | |
Correlation of cytological findings with histopathological findings in 180 patients.
| Cytological finding | Histopathological findings | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Inflammatory | CIN-I | CIN-II | CIN-III | Carcinoma | |
| Normal | — | 08 | 05 | — | — | — |
| Inflammatory | — | 51 | 11 | 02 | — | — |
| Mild dysplasia | — | 04 | 40 | 04 | 02 | — |
| Moderate dysplasia | — | — | 04 | 24 | 03 | — |
| Severe dysplasia | — | — | — | — | 11 | — |
| Carcinoma | — | — | — | — | — | 11 |
|
| ||||||
| Total | — | 63 | 60 | 30 | 16 | 11 |
Colposcopic findings of the study population (230).
| Histological diagnosis | Normal | Colposcopic findings | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetowhite | Mosaic | Punctation | Atypical vessels | Schiller's positive | Unsatisfactory | Total | ||
| No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | |||
| Normal (%) | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50 |
| Inflammatory (%) | — | 63 (100) | 06 (9.52) | 08 (12.69) | — | 14 (22.22) | — | 63 |
| CIN-I (%) | — | 60 (100) | 15 (25) | 22 (36.6) | — | 36 (60) | 02 (3.33) | 60 |
| CIN-II (%) | — | 30 (100) | 14 (46.6) | 16 (53.3) | 02 (6.67) | 19 (63.3) | — | 30 |
| CIN-III (%) | — | 16 (100) | 06 (37.5) | 04 (25) | 02 (12.5) | 16 (100) | 06 (37.5) | 16 |
| Carcinoma (%) | — | 11 (100) | 11 (100) | 11 (100) | 11 (100) | 11 (100) | — | 11 |
Correlation of colposcopic findings using colposcopic index with histopathological findings.
| Colposcopic index | Histopathological findings | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inflammatory (No.) | CIN-I (No.) | CIN-II (No.) | CIN-III (No.) | Carcinoma (No.) | |
| 0 | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1 | 32 | 17 | — | — | — |
| 2 | 23 | 23 | — | — | — |
| 3 | 06 | 12 | 09 | — | — |
| 4 | 02 | 08 | 08 | 05 | — |
| 5 | — | — | 08 | 07 | — |
| 6 | — | — | 05 | 04 | — |
| 7 | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | 11 |
|
| |||||
| Total | 63 | 60 | 30 | 16 | 11 |
Comparison of mean vascular density in different stages of preinvasive and invasive lesions using haematoxylin and eosin staining and CD-31 immunostaining (per high power field).
| S. no. | Stage | No. of cases | MVD-HE | MVD-CD31 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | S.E. of mean | Mean ± SD | S.E. of mean | |||
| 1 | CIN-I | 17 | 2.53 ± 1.007 | 0.24 | 4.06 ± 0.83 | 0.20 |
| 2 | CIN-II | 05 | 3.64 ± 1.10 | 0.29 | 5.40 ± 1.84 | 0.48 |
| 3 | CIN-III | 07 | 8.43 ± 2.64 | 0.99 | 8.86 ± 1.46 | 0.55 |
| 4 | Carcinoma | 11 | 9.18 ± 2.32 | 0.69 | 12.82 ± 4.07 | 1.23 |
Comparison of mean vessel density by HE and CD-31 staining (per high power field).
| S. no. | Group | No. of cases | Mean ± SD |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preinvasive | ||||
| 1 | HE | 39 | 4.01 ± 2.57 | 0.011 |
| 2 | CD31 | 39 | 5.44 ± 2.21 | |
|
| ||||
| Invasive | ||||
| 3 | HE | 11 | 9.18 ± 2.32 | 0.018 |
| 4 | CD31 | 11 | 12.82 ± 4.07 | |
Figure 1CIN 1 showing low CD31 positivity (×400).
Figure 2CIN II showing moderate CD31 positivity (×400).
Figure 3CIN III showing high CD31 positivity (×400).