Literature DB >> 24167232

Barium versus nonbarium stimuli: differences in taste intensity, chemesthesis, and swallowing behavior in healthy adult women.

Ahmed Nagy, Catriona M Steele, Cathy A Pelletier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors examined the impact of barium on the perceived taste intensity of 7 different liquid tastant stimuli and the modulatory effect that these differences in perceived taste intensity have on swallowing behaviors.
METHOD: Participants were 80 healthy women, stratified by age group (<40; >60) and genetic taste status (supertasters; nontasters). Perceived taste intensity and chemesthetic properties (fizziness; burning-stinging) were rated for 7 tastant solutions (each prepared with and without barium) using the general Labeled Magnitude Scale. Tongue-palate pressures and submental surface electromyography (sEMG) were simultaneously measured during swallowing of these same randomized liquids. Path analysis differentiated the effects of stimulus, genetic taste status, age, barium condition, taste intensity, and an effortful saliva swallow strength covariate on swallowing.
RESULTS: Barium stimuli were rated as having reduced taste intensity compared with nonbarium stimuli. Barium also dampened fizziness but did not influence burning-stinging sensation. The amplitudes of tongue-palate pressure or submental sEMG did not differ when swallowing barium versus nonbarium stimuli.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite impacting taste intensity, the addition of barium to liquid stimuli does not appear to alter behavioral parameters of swallowing. Barium solutions can be considered to elicit behaviors that are similar to those used with nonbarium liquids outside the assessment situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24167232     DOI: 10.1044/2013_JSLHR-S-13-0136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  6 in total

1.  Identification of the most significant electrode positions in electromyographic evaluation of swallowing-related movements in humans.

Authors:  E Zaretsky; P Pluschinski; R Sader; P Birkholz; C Neuschaefer-Rube; Christiane Hey
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Sour taste increases swallowing and prolongs hemodynamic responses in the cortical swallowing network.

Authors:  Rachel W Mulheren; Erin Kamarunas; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Detection of Aspiration, Penetration, and Pharyngeal Residue During Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES): Comparing the Effects of Color, Coating, and Opacity.

Authors:  James A Curtis; Zeina N Seikaly; Avery E Dakin; Michelle S Troche
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Modulation of Tongue Pressure According to Liquid Flow Properties in Healthy Swallowing.

Authors:  Catriona M Steele; Melanie Peladeau-Pigeon; Carly A E Barbon; Brittany T Guida; Melanie S Tapson; Teresa J Valenzano; Ashley A Waito; Talia S Wolkin; Ben Hanson; Jane Jun-Xin Ong; Lisa M Duizer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Genetic Taster Status as a Mediator of Neural Activity and Swallowing Mechanics in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Angela M Dietsch; Ross M Westemeyer; William G Pearson; Douglas H Schultz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Differences in swallowing between high and low concentration taste stimuli.

Authors:  Ahmed Nagy; Catriona M Steele; Cathy A Pelletier
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.