BACKGROUND: Hospital mortality has decreased over time for critically ill patients with various forms of brain injury. We hypothesized that the proportion of patients who progress to neurologic death may have also decreased. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study involving consecutive adult patients with traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage or anoxic brain injury admitted to regional intensive care units in southern Alberta over a 10.5-year period. We used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for patient age and score on the Glasgow Coma Scale at admission, and to assess whether the proportion of patients who progress to neurologic death has changed over time. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 2788 patients. The proportion of patients who progressed to neurologic death was 8.1% at the start of the study period, and the adjusted odds of progressing to neurologic death decreased over the study period (odds ratio [OR] per yr 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.98, p = 0.006). This change was most pronounced among patients with traumatic brain injury (OR per yr 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.96, p = 0.005); there was no change among patients with anoxic injury (OR per yr 0.96, 95% CI 0.85-1.09, p = 0.6). A review of the medical records suggests that missed cases of neurologic death were rare (≤ 0.5% of deaths). INTERPRETATION: The proportion of patients with brain injury who progress to neurologic death has decreased over time, especially among those with head trauma. This finding may reflect positive developments in the prevention and care of brain injury. However, organ donation after neurologic death represents the major source of organs for transplantation. Thus, these findings may help explain the relatively stagnant rates of deceased organ donation in some regions of Canada, which in turn has important implications for the care of patients with end-stage organ failure.
BACKGROUND: Hospital mortality has decreased over time for critically illpatients with various forms of brain injury. We hypothesized that the proportion of patients who progress to neurologic death may have also decreased. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study involving consecutive adult patients with traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage or anoxic brain injury admitted to regional intensive care units in southern Alberta over a 10.5-year period. We used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for patient age and score on the Glasgow Coma Scale at admission, and to assess whether the proportion of patients who progress to neurologic death has changed over time. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 2788 patients. The proportion of patients who progressed to neurologic death was 8.1% at the start of the study period, and the adjusted odds of progressing to neurologic death decreased over the study period (odds ratio [OR] per yr 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.98, p = 0.006). This change was most pronounced among patients with traumatic brain injury (OR per yr 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.96, p = 0.005); there was no change among patients with anoxic injury (OR per yr 0.96, 95% CI 0.85-1.09, p = 0.6). A review of the medical records suggests that missed cases of neurologic death were rare (≤ 0.5% of deaths). INTERPRETATION: The proportion of patients with brain injury who progress to neurologic death has decreased over time, especially among those with head trauma. This finding may reflect positive developments in the prevention and care of brain injury. However, organ donation after neurologic death represents the major source of organs for transplantation. Thus, these findings may help explain the relatively stagnant rates of deceased organ donation in some regions of Canada, which in turn has important implications for the care of patients with end-stage organ failure.
Authors: Reza F Saidi; James F Markmann; Nicolas Jabbour; YouFu Li; Shimul A Shah; A B Cosimi; Adel Bozorgzadeh Journal: World J Surg Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Roberto Hernadez-Alejandro; William Wall; Anthony Jevnikar; Patrick Luke; Michael Sharpe; David Russell; Azeem Gangji; Edward Cole; Sang Joseph Kim; Marcus Selzner; Shaf Keshavjee; Dianne Hebert; G V Ramesh Prasad; Andrew Baker; Greg Knoll; Robyn Winterbottom; Guiseppe Pagliarello; Clare Payne; Jeff Zaltzman Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2011-05-03 Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: Alexis F Turgeon; François Lauzier; Jean-François Simard; Damon C Scales; Karen E A Burns; Lynne Moore; David A Zygun; Francis Bernard; Maureen O Meade; Tran Cong Dung; Mohana Ratnapalan; Stephanie Todd; John Harlock; Dean A Fergusson Journal: CMAJ Date: 2011-08-29 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Ina Jochmans; Tom Darius; Dirk Kuypers; Diethard Monbaliu; Eric Goffin; Michel Mourad; Hieu Ledinh; Laurent Weekers; Patrick Peeters; Caren Randon; Jean-Louis Bosmans; Geert Roeyen; Daniel Abramowicz; Anh-Dung Hoang; Luc De Pauw; Axel Rahmel; Jean-Paul Squifflet; Jacques Pirenne Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Kristopher P Croome; Amit K Mathur; David D Lee; Adyr A Moss; Charles B Rosen; Julie K Heimbach; C Burcin Taner Journal: Transplantation Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Andreas H Kramer; Kerry Holliday; Sean Keenan; George Isac; Demetrios J Kutsogiannis; Norman M Kneteman; Adrian Robertson; Peter Nickerson; Lee Anne Tibbles Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Alberto Sandiumenge; Julien Charpentier; John A Kellum; Alan M Gaffney; Francesco Procaccio; Glauco A Westphal Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Thomas M Egan; Benjamin E Haithcock; Jason Lobo; Gita Mody; Robert B Love; John Jacob Requard; John Espey; Mir Hasnain Ali Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2021-11 Impact factor: 3.005
Authors: Frederick D'Aragon; Olivier Lachance; Vincent Lafleur; Ivan Ortega-Deballon; Marie-Helene Masse; Gabrielle Trepanier; Daphnee Lamarche; Marie-Claude Battista Journal: Open Access Emerg Med Date: 2022-08-05