Literature DB >> 24167001

Nutrient digestibility of lentil and regular- and low-oligosaccharide, micronized full-fat soybean fed to grower pigs.

T A Woyengo1, R Jha, E Beltranena, A Pharazyn, R T Zijlstra.   

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine the standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of AA and calculate the NE value for regular-oligosaccharide, micronized full-fat soybean (R-MFFSB), low-oligosaccharide, micronized full-fat soybean (LO-MFFSB), lentil, and enzymatically hydrolyzed casein (EHC) for growing pigs. Six ileal-cannulated barrows (31.4 kg BW) were fed 6 diets in a 6 × 6 Latin square. Five diets were cornstarch based, containing either soybean meal (SBM), R-MFFSB, LO-MFFSB, or EHC as sole protein source or N free. The sixth diet contained lentil as sole protein and energy source. The SID of AA for diets was calculated using the N-free diet. Digestibility of AA in feedstuffs was determined by the direct method. Energy digestibility in SBM, R-MFFSB, and LO-MFFSB was determined by difference from the N-free diet whereas energy digestibility in lentil was determined by the direct method. On DM basis, SBM, R-MFFSB, LO-MFFSB, and lentil contained 52, 43, 43, and 27% CP, 8, 12, 14, and 16% NDF, and 1.8, 19, 21, and 1.6% ether extract, respectively. The SID of Lys for SBM was greater (P < 0.05) than that for R-MFFSB or LO-MFFSB (76 vs. 79 and 79%). The SID of other indispensable AA (except Trp) for SBM was also greater (P < 0.05) than that for R-MFFSB or LO-MFFSB. The R-MFFSB and LO-MFFSB were similar in SID of AA. The SID of Lys for lentil (81%) was lower (P < 0.05) than that for SBM with a similar trend for SID of other indispensable AA except for Met and Thr whose SID was similar to SBM. The SID of AA for EHC ranged from 98 to 112%. The SBM had a lower (P < 0.05) NE value than R-MFFSB or LO-MFFSB (2.63 vs. 2.95 and 3.00 Mcal/kg DM). Lentil and SBM were similar in NE value (2.60 vs. 2.63 Mcal/kg DM). In conclusion, R-MFFSB and LO-MFFSB were similar in energy and AA value for pigs. Lentil had lower SID of AA than SBM. However, lentil and SBM were similar in NE value; therefore, lentil can serve as alternative pulse feedstuff for pigs. The AA in EHC were mostly completely digested indicating that EHC can be fed to estimate ileal endogenous AA losses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24167001     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

1.  Digestibility of amino acids, energy, and minerals in roasted full-fat soybean and expelled-extruded soybean meal fed to growing pigs without or with multienzyme supplement containing fiber-degrading enzymes, protease, and phytase.

Authors:  Elijah G Kiarie; Ilona A Parenteau; Cuilan Zhu; Nelson E Ward; Aaron J Cowieson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Nutritive value of multienzyme supplemented cold-pressed camelina cake for pigs.

Authors:  T A Woyengo; R Patterson; C L Levesque
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Nutrient digestibility of soybean products in grower-finisher pigs1.

Authors:  Jorge L Yáñez; Tofuko A Woyengo; Rajesh Jha; Theo A T G Van Kempen; Ruurd T Zijlstra
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Net energy value of canola meal, field pea, and wheat millrun fed to growing-finishing pigs.

Authors:  Tofuko Awori Woyengo; Ruurd T Zijlstra
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 5.  Protein quality of soy and the effect of processing: A quantitative review.

Authors:  Lisa A van den Berg; Jurriaan J Mes; Marco Mensink; Anne J Wanders
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-09-27

6.  Digestibility of Amino Acids in Protein-Rich Feed Ingredients Originating from Animals, Peanut Flour, and Full-Fat Soybeans Fed to Pigs.

Authors:  Ayodeji Simeon Aderibigbe; Chan Sol Park; Adekunle Adebiyi; Oluyinka Abiona Olukosi; Olayiwola Adeola
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.