Literature DB >> 24166910

Comparative efficacy of bisphosphonates in metastatic breast and prostate cancer and multiple myeloma: a mixed-treatment meta-analysis.

Carlo Palmieri1, John R Fullarton, Janet Brown.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A mixed-treatment comparison (MTC) was undertaken to compare the efficacy of zoledronic acid, clodronate, pamidronate, and ibandronate (i.v. and oral) in patients with skeletal-related events (SRE) secondary to metastatic breast and prostate cancer and multiple myeloma. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Studies of bisphosphonates in the three malignancies were identified and SRE data were extracted. Outcomes from the MTC were expressed as the annual SRE rate and as the mean likelihood (probability) ratio for the rate of SREs during treatment with zoledronic acid compared with the other bisphosphonates.
RESULTS: A total of 17 studies were identified (7 breast, 3 prostate, and 7 multiple myeloma). Data were available for all bisphosphonates in breast cancer; no data were available for ibandronate (oral or i.v.) in prostate cancer or for oral ibandronate in multiple myeloma. The SRE rates in breast cancer were 1.60 for zoledronic acid, 1.67 for oral ibandronate (excess SRE rate, 4%), 1.70 for i.v. ibandronate (6%), 2.07 for pamidronate (29%), and 2.29 for clodronate (42%). In prostate cancer, the SRE rates were 0.83 for zoledronic acid, 1.11 for clodronate (35%), and 1.41 for pamidronate (71%). In multiple myeloma, the SRE rates were 1.43 for zoledronic acid, 1.64 for pamidronate (15%), 1.90 for clodronate (33%), and 2.49 for i.v. ibandronate (75%).
CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid seems to be the most efficacious bisphosphonate for reducing the risk of SREs in patients with cancer of the breast or prostate and those with multiple myeloma. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24166910     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  10 in total

1.  CORR Insights ®: Intramedullary nailing of femoral diaphyseal metastases: is it necessary to protect the femoral neck?

Authors:  Mark T Scarborough
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Practical update for the use of bone-targeted agents in patients with bone metastases from metastatic breast cancer or castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  D Southcott; A Awan; K Ghate; M Clemons; R Fernandes
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Osteoclasts are not activated in middle ear cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Hiroki Koizumi; Hideaki Suzuki; Shoji Ikezaki; Toyoaki Ohbuchi; Koichi Hashida; Akinori Sakai
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 4.  Differences of osteoblastic bone metastases and osteolytic bone metastases in clinical features and molecular characteristics.

Authors:  J Fang; Q Xu
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Local RANKL delivery improves socket healing in bisphosphonate treated rats.

Authors:  Akrivoula Soundia; Danny Hadaya; Yee Chau; Ioannis Gkouveris; Olga Bezouglaia; Sarah Dry; Flavia Pirih; Tara Aghaloo; Sotirios Tetradis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.626

6.  Ibandronate to treat skeletal-related events and bone pain in metastatic bone disease or multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Chun-Jing Geng; Qian Liang; Jian-Hong Zhong; Min Zhu; Fan-Ying Meng; Ning Wu; Rui Liang; Bin-Yi Yuan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The incidence and relative risk of adverse events in patients treated with bisphosphonate therapy for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan-Li Yang; Zi-Jian Xiang; Jing-Hua Yang; Wen-Jie Wang; Ruo-Lan Xiang
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 8.168

8.  Resolving cancer-stroma interfacial signalling and interventions with micropatterned tumour-stromal assays.

Authors:  Keyue Shen; Samantha Luk; Daniel F Hicks; Jessica S Elman; Stefan Bohr; Yoshiko Iwamoto; Ryan Murray; Kristen Pena; Fangjing Wang; Erkin Seker; Ralph Weissleder; Martin L Yarmush; Mehmet Toner; Dennis Sgroi; Biju Parekkadan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  A multicenter, retrospective epidemiologic survey of the clinical features and management of bone metastatic disease in China.

Authors:  Yunpeng Yang; Yuxiang Ma; Jin Sheng; Yan Huang; Yuanyuan Zhao; Wenfeng Fang; Shaodong Hong; Ying Tian; Cong Xue; Li Zhang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2016-04-25

Review 10.  Immune system and bone microenvironment: rationale for targeted cancer therapies.

Authors:  Antonio Gnoni; Oronzo Brunetti; Vito Longo; Angela Calabrese; Antonel-la Argentiero; Roberto Calbi; Giovanni Solimando Antonio; Antonella Licchetta
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2020-01-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.