Literature DB >> 24165446

Pelvic mesh complications in women before and after the 2011 FDA public health notification.

Nicklaus Trent Rice1, Yan Hu, James Chris Slaughter, Renee Melva Ward.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: On July 13, 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a public health notification with concerns regarding vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Our study compares the frequency and type of mesh complications related to female pelvic floor disorders presenting to our center before and after this notification.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing the percentage of women found to have mesh complications related to pelvic floor disorders for the year preceding and the 6 months following the FDA notification. The 2011 International Urogynecological Association/International Continence Society (IUGA/ICS) guidelines were used to classify mesh complications.
RESULTS: We identified 109 women in the 12 months before and 98 women in the 6 months after the FDA notification who presented for new consultation with a history of pelvic mesh placement. Of the women with prior mesh, a higher percentage had a mesh complaint after the FDA notification (31.2% before vs 45.9% after notification; P = 0.029). There was no difference in the frequency of diagnosed mesh complications (38.5% before vs 43.9% after notification; P = 0.435) or the types of complications seen as classified by the IUGA/ICS guidelines. The rate of complications among women with a prior sacral colpopexy (35%) or midurethral sling (30%) was higher than expected for both time periods.
CONCLUSIONS: Whereas the number of patient-perceived mesh complications increased after the FDA notification, neither the frequency, type, or location of complications changed. The complications were not limited to transvaginal mesh, and an unexpectedly high proportion of the complications were related to sacral colpopexy and midurethral sling procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24165446     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182a330c1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  9 in total

Review 1.  Drugs and Medical Devices: Adverse Events and the Impact on Women's Health.

Authors:  Jennifer L Carey; Nathalie Nader; Peter R Chai; Stephanie Carreiro; Matthew K Griswold; Katherine L Boyle
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.393

2.  Changing surgical trends for female stress urinary incontinence in England.

Authors:  Martino Maria Zacche; Sambit Mukhopadhyay; Ilias Giarenis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Female stress urinary incontinence surgery: 'Resurgence of the Titans'.

Authors:  Michel Wyndaele; Chendrimada Madhu; Hashim Hashim
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2021-05

4.  Trends in internet search activity, media coverage, and patient-centered health information after the FDA safety communications on surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Benjamin V Stone; James C Forde; Valerie B Levit; Richard K Lee; Alexis E Te; Bilal Chughtai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  What a mesh! An Australian experience using national female continence surgery trends over 20 years.

Authors:  Aoife McVey; Liang G Qu; Garson Chan; Marlon Perera; Janelle Brennan; Eric Chung; Johan Gani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Long-Term Outcomes After Midurethral Mesh Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Sara Z Dejene; Michele Jonsson Funk; Virginia Pate; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 1.913

7.  A Novel Operative Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Utilizing a MRI-Visible Mesh Implant: Safety and Outcome of Modified Laparoscopic Bilateral Sacropexy.

Authors:  Ralf Joukhadar; Gabriele Meyberg-Solomayer; Amr Hamza; Julia Radosa; Werner Bader; Dimitri Barski; Fakher Ismaeel; Guenther Schneider; Erich Solomayer; Sascha Baum
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  The regulatory ancestral network of surgical meshes.

Authors:  Nasim Zargar; Andrew Carr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System(®).

Authors:  Daniel J Cher; W Carlton Reckling; Robyn A Capobianco
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-11-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.