OBJECTIVE: The prevalence and clinical characteristics of IgG4-related hypophysitis remain unclear due to the limited number of case reports. Therefore, in this study, we screened consecutive outpatients with hypopituitarism and/or diabetes insipidus (DI) to estimate its prevalence. METHODS: A total of 170 consecutive outpatients with hypopituitarism and/or central DI were screened at Kobe University Hospital for detecting IgG4-related hypophysitis by pituitary magnetic resonance imaging, measuring serum IgG4 concentrations, assessing the involvement of other organs, and carrying out an immunohistochemical analysis to detect IgG4-positive cell infiltration. RESULTS: Among the screened cases, 116 cases were excluded due to diagnosis of other causes such as tumors and congenital abnormalities. Additionally, 22 cases with isolated ACTH deficiency were analyzed and were found not to meet the criteria of IgG4-related hypophysitis. The remaining 32 cases were screened and seven were diagnosed with IgG4-related hypophysitis, of which three cases were diagnosed by analyzing pituitary specimens. IgG4-related hypophysitis was detected in 30% (seven of 23 patients) of hypophysitis cases and 4% of all hypopituitarism/DI cases. The mean age at the onset of IgG4-related hypophysitis was 61.8±8.8 years, and the serum IgG4 concentration was 191.1±78.3 mg/dl (normal values 5-105 mg/dl and values in IgG4-related disease (RD) ≥135 mg/dl). Pituitary gland and/or stalk swelling was observed in six patients, and an empty sella was observed in one patient. Multiple co-existing organ involvement was observed in four of the seven patients prior to the onset of IgG4-related hypophysitis. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the prevalence of IgG4-related hypophysitis has been underestimated. We should also consider the possibility of the development of hypopituitarism/DI caused by IgG4-related hypophysitis during the clinical course of other IgG4-RDs.
OBJECTIVE: The prevalence and clinical characteristics of IgG4-related hypophysitis remain unclear due to the limited number of case reports. Therefore, in this study, we screened consecutive outpatients with hypopituitarism and/or diabetes insipidus (DI) to estimate its prevalence. METHODS: A total of 170 consecutive outpatients with hypopituitarism and/or central DI were screened at Kobe University Hospital for detecting IgG4-related hypophysitis by pituitary magnetic resonance imaging, measuring serum IgG4 concentrations, assessing the involvement of other organs, and carrying out an immunohistochemical analysis to detect IgG4-positive cell infiltration. RESULTS: Among the screened cases, 116 cases were excluded due to diagnosis of other causes such as tumors and congenital abnormalities. Additionally, 22 cases with isolated ACTHdeficiency were analyzed and were found not to meet the criteria of IgG4-related hypophysitis. The remaining 32 cases were screened and seven were diagnosed with IgG4-related hypophysitis, of which three cases were diagnosed by analyzing pituitary specimens. IgG4-related hypophysitis was detected in 30% (seven of 23 patients) of hypophysitis cases and 4% of all hypopituitarism/DI cases. The mean age at the onset of IgG4-related hypophysitis was 61.8±8.8 years, and the serum IgG4 concentration was 191.1±78.3 mg/dl (normal values 5-105 mg/dl and values in IgG4-related disease (RD) ≥135 mg/dl). Pituitary gland and/or stalk swelling was observed in six patients, and an empty sella was observed in one patient. Multiple co-existing organ involvement was observed in four of the seven patients prior to the onset of IgG4-related hypophysitis. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the prevalence of IgG4-related hypophysitis has been underestimated. We should also consider the possibility of the development of hypopituitarism/DI caused by IgG4-related hypophysitis during the clinical course of other IgG4-RDs.
Authors: Amit Mahajan; Richard A Bronen; Ali Y Mian; Sacit Bulent Omay; Dennis D Spencer; Silvio E Inzucchi Journal: Endocrine Date: 2020-03-11 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Alexander Kleger; Thomas Seufferlein; Martin Wagner; Andrea Tannapfel; Thomas K Hoffmann; Julia Mayerle Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2015-02-20 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: R Kurokawa; Y Ota; W Gonoi; A Hagiwara; M Kurokawa; H Mori; E Maeda; S Amemiya; Y Usui; N Sato; Y Nakata; T Moritani; O Abe Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 3.825