OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the disease activity and current pharmacological interventions used to achieve remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Australia. METHODS: Rheumatoid arthritis patients treated in participating Australian clinics were included in the study. Patient demographics, disease onset, medications and disease measures were analyzed. Data, de-identified to the patient, clinic and clinician were captured using an electronic clinical management program. The disease activity score (DAS28) was used to classify patients into the disease activity states of remission, low disease activity (LDA), moderate disease activity (MDA) and high disease activity (HDA). Choice of therapy was at the discretion of the treating clinician. RESULTS: A total of 5686 patients, 72.9% female, 26.9% male, with mean age 61.1 (SD 13.6) years and mean disease duration of 11.5 (SD 10.5) years were analyzed. DAS28 ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) scores were recorded for 2973 patients, with 41.6% in remission, 18.6% LDA, 31.6% MDA and 8.2% HDA. Of those in remission, 17% received a biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD), 73% methotrexate (MTX), 19% leflunomide (LEF) and 28% prednisolone. Of the patients with MDA, 20% received a bDMARD, 76% MTX, 24% LEF and 39% prednisolone. Of the patients in HDA, 27% received a bDMARD, 78% MTX, 31% LEF and 60% with prednisolone. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional assessment of this large cohort of Australian RA patients found a large proportion remain in moderate or high disease activity; suggesting a considerable evidence-practice gap. Improvement in disease control in this group may reduce future health burdens.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the disease activity and current pharmacological interventions used to achieve remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Australia. METHODS:Rheumatoid arthritispatients treated in participating Australian clinics were included in the study. Patient demographics, disease onset, medications and disease measures were analyzed. Data, de-identified to the patient, clinic and clinician were captured using an electronic clinical management program. The disease activity score (DAS28) was used to classify patients into the disease activity states of remission, low disease activity (LDA), moderate disease activity (MDA) and high disease activity (HDA). Choice of therapy was at the discretion of the treating clinician. RESULTS: A total of 5686 patients, 72.9% female, 26.9% male, with mean age 61.1 (SD 13.6) years and mean disease duration of 11.5 (SD 10.5) years were analyzed. DAS28 ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) scores were recorded for 2973 patients, with 41.6% in remission, 18.6% LDA, 31.6% MDA and 8.2% HDA. Of those in remission, 17% received a biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD), 73% methotrexate (MTX), 19% leflunomide (LEF) and 28% prednisolone. Of the patients with MDA, 20% received a bDMARD, 76% MTX, 24% LEF and 39% prednisolone. Of the patients in HDA, 27% received a bDMARD, 78% MTX, 31% LEF and 60% with prednisolone. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional assessment of this large cohort of Australian RApatients found a large proportion remain in moderate or high disease activity; suggesting a considerable evidence-practice gap. Improvement in disease control in this group may reduce future health burdens.
Authors: Emilia Gvozdenović; Cornelia F Allaart; Désirée van der Heijde; Gianfranco Ferraccioli; Josef S Smolen; Tom W J Huizinga; Robert Landewé Journal: RMD Open Date: 2016-04-28
Authors: Lynden Roberts; Kathleen Tymms; Julien de Jager; Geoffrey Littlejohn; Hedley Griffiths; Dave Nicholls; Paul Bird; Jennifer Young; Julie Hill; Jane Zochling Journal: Int J Rheumatol Date: 2017-05-23
Authors: Marloes Vermeer; Hillechiena H Kuper; Hein J Bernelot Moens; Monique Hoekstra; Marcel D Posthumus; Piet L C M van Riel; Mart A F J van de Laar Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2012-11-23 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Emilia Gvozdenović; Ron Wolterbeek; Désirée van der Heijde; Tom Huizinga; Cornelia Allaart; Robert Landewé Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2016-01-16 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: G Akdemir; I M Markusse; Y P M Goekoop-Ruiterman; G M Steup-Beekman; B A M Grillet; P J S M Kerstens; W F Lems; T W J Huizinga; C F Allaart Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Leonieke J J van Mens; Marleen G H van de Sande; Inka A Fluri; Sadaf Atiqi; Arno W R van Kuijk; Dominique L P Baeten Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 5.156