Literature DB >> 2416461

Tn10 protects itself at two levels from fortuitous activation by external promoters.

M A Davis, R W Simons, N Kleckner.   

Abstract

Tn10 rarely transposes, primarily because its IS10-encoded transposase protein is synthesized infrequently. Since the 5' end of the transposase gene is immediately adjacent to flanking host sequences, insertion of Tn10 into an actively transcribed operon could conceivably result in dramatically increased transposition. We show here that Tn10 is protected from such fortuitous activation; high levels of transcription from an upstream promoter actually decrease its rate of transposition. Protection operates at two levels. First, externally-initiated transcripts yield only a small amount of additional transposase protein, primarily because of inhibition at a posttranscriptional level. We suggest that the transposase gene start codon is sequestered in an mRNA secondary structure not present in transcripts initiated at the normal promoter. Second, transcription per se across an IS10 terminus inhibits its activity, thus negating any small transposase increase. These observations provide additional evidence that Tn10 has evolved specific mechanisms for keeping its transposition activity low.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2416461     DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90043-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  23 in total

1.  Premature terminator analysis sheds light on a hidden world of bacterial transcriptional attenuation.

Authors:  Magali Naville; Daniel Gautheret
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 13.583

2.  Genetic and sequence organization of the mcrBC locus of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  D Dila; E Sutherland; L Moran; B Slatko; E A Raleigh
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Functional analysis of the 3'-terminal sequence of the maize controlling element (Ac) by internal replacement and deletion mutagenesis.

Authors:  J H Zhou; A Myers; A G Atherly
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  The deleterious effect of an insertion sequence removing the last twenty percent of the essential Escherichia coli rpsA gene is due to mRNA destabilization, not protein truncation.

Authors:  Patricia Skorski; Florence Proux; Chainez Cheraiti; Marc Dreyfus; Sylvie Hermann-Le Denmat
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  Insertion sequences.

Authors:  J Mahillon; M Chandler
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  ISD1, an insertion element from the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough: structure, transposition, and distribution.

Authors:  R Fu; G Voordouw
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Regulation of repressor and early gene expression in Mu-like transposable bacteriophage D108.

Authors:  D B Levin; M S DuBow
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1989-06

8.  Translational coupling between the ilvD and ilvA genes of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  E Harms; E Higgins; J W Chen; H E Umbarger
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Multiple copies of IS10 in the Enterobacter cloacae MD36 chromosome.

Authors:  S Matsutani
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Genetic rearrangements in the rfb regions of Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139.

Authors:  U H Stroeher; K E Jedani; B K Dredge; R Morona; M H Brown; L E Karageorgos; M J Albert; P A Manning
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.