Literature DB >> 24162857

Predictors of never being screened for cervical cancer by metropolitan area.

Sandte L Stanley1, Cheryll C Thomas, Jessica B King, Lisa C Richardson.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown an association between cervical cancer screening and racial/ethnic minority status, no usual source of care, and lower socioeconomic status. This study describes the demographics and health beliefs of women who report never being screened for cervical cancer by area of residence. Data from the 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were used to study women aged 21-65 years who reported never being screened for cervical cancer. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to calculate predicted marginals to examine associations between never being screened and demographic characteristics and health belief model (HBM) constructs by metropolitan statistical area (MSA). After adjusting for all demographics and HBM constructs, prevalence of never being screened was higher for the following women: non-Hispanic Asians/Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (16.5 %, 95 % CI = 13.7 %, 19.8 %) who live in MSAs; those with only a high school diploma who live in MSAs (5.5 %, 95 % CI = 4.7 %, 6.5 %); those living in non-MSAs who reported "fair or poor" general health (4.1 %, 95 % CI = 3.1 %, 5.4 %); and those living in either MSAs and non-MSAs unable to see a doctor within the past 12 months because of cost (MSA: 4.4 %, 95 % CI = 4.0 %, 4.8 %; non-MSA: 3.4 %, 95 % CI = 2.9 %, 3.9 %). The Affordable Care Act will expand access to insurance coverage for cervical cancer screening, without cost sharing for millions of women, essentially eliminating insurance costs as a barrier. Future interventions for women who have never been screened should focus on promoting the importance of screening and reaching non-Hispanic Asians/Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders who live in MSAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24162857      PMCID: PMC4451596          DOI: 10.1007/s10900-013-9778-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  37 in total

1.  Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

Authors:  D E Nelson; D Holtzman; J Bolen; C A Stanwyck; K A Mack
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2001

2.  Comparison of breast and cervical cancer screening utilization among rural and urban Hispanic and American Indian women in the Southwestern United States.

Authors:  Tomas Nuño; Joe K Gerald; Robin Harris; Maria Elena Martinez; Antonio Estrada; Francisco García
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by individual-level and area-based measures of socioeconomic status, 2000 to 2002.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Jessica King; Thomas B Richards; Donatus U Ekwueme
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Improving question wording in surveys of culturally diverse populations.

Authors:  R B Warnecke; T P Johnson; N Chávez; S Sudman; D P O'Rourke; L Lacey; J Horm
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Overcoming Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening Among Asian American Women.

Authors:  Carolyn Y Fang; Grace X Ma; Yin Tan
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci (Boston)       Date:  2011

6.  Predictors of cervical cancer screening for rarely or never screened rural Appalachian women.

Authors:  Jennifer Hatcher; Christina R Studts; Mark B Dignan; Lisa M Turner; Nancy E Schoenberg
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2011-02

7.  Factors associated with never being screened for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sandte L Stanley; Jessica B King; Cheryll C Thomas; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-02

Review 8.  Theories and intervention approaches to health-behavior change in primary care.

Authors:  J P Elder; G X Ayala; S Harris
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines for U.S. women aged 25-64: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Authors:  Wendy Nelson; Richard P Moser; Allison Gaffey; William Waldron
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model.

Authors:  Marja Jylhä
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  7 in total

1.  Screening histories and contact with physicians as determinants of cervical cancer risk in Montreal, Quebec.

Authors:  A R Spence; A Alobaid; P Drouin; P Goggin; L Gilbert; D Provencher; P Tousignant; J A Hanley; E L Franco
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  The effectiveness of targeting never or rarely screened women in a national cervical cancer screening program for underserved women.

Authors:  V B Benard; J Royalty; M Saraiya; T Rockwell; W Helsel
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Is the Electronic Health Record the Answer to Improving Patient Compliance with Recommended Health Interventions?

Authors:  Deanna Teoh
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Mental Health Problems and Cancer Risk Factors Among Young Adults.

Authors:  Greta M Massetti; Cheryll C Thomas; Jessica King; Kathleen Ragan; Natasha Buchanan Lunsford
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Hongyuan Gao; Susan Brandzel; Susan Carol Bradford; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Factors associated with cervical cancer screening in a safety net population.

Authors:  Meredith A Heberer; Ian K Komenaka; Jesse N Nodora; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Sonal G Gandhi; Lauren E Welch; Marcia E Bouton; Paula Aristizabal; Barry D Weiss; Maria Elena Martinez
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-10

7.  Prioritizing US Cervical Cancer Prevention With Results From a Geospatial Model.

Authors:  Jonathan K Kish; Alicia I Rolin; Zhaohui Zou; James E Cucinelli; Zaria Tatalovich; Mona Saraiya; Sean F Altekruse
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2016-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.