K Haas-Lude1, M Wolff, B Will, B Bender, M Krimmel. 1. Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, Children's Hospital, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany, karin.haas@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: True unilateral lambdoid synostosis is a very rare type of craniosynostosis. Patients present with unilateral posterior plagiocephaly. The differentiation between frequent, simple positional (deformational) posterior plagiocephaly and lambdoid synostosis is not easy and to date subject of controversy. Accurate and early diagnosis is important, because treatment is different. Simple positional plagiocephaly responds to conservative treatment, but craniosynostosis may require neurosurgical intervention. We analyzed clinical presentation of five patients in whom non-syndromic lambdoid synostosis was confirmed by CT imaging, in one additionally by high-resolution ultrasound, and finally neurosurgical intervention. However, clinical inspection alone did not reliably identify infants with lambdoid synostosis. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of lambdoid synostosis is not always possible based on clinical inspection alone. To confirm the diagnosis imaging is recommended. There is evidence that high-resolution ultrasound can be used first-line in the future.
UNLABELLED: True unilateral lambdoid synostosis is a very rare type of craniosynostosis. Patients present with unilateral posterior plagiocephaly. The differentiation between frequent, simple positional (deformational) posterior plagiocephaly and lambdoid synostosis is not easy and to date subject of controversy. Accurate and early diagnosis is important, because treatment is different. Simple positional plagiocephaly responds to conservative treatment, but craniosynostosis may require neurosurgical intervention. We analyzed clinical presentation of five patients in whom non-syndromic lambdoid synostosis was confirmed by CT imaging, in one additionally by high-resolution ultrasound, and finally neurosurgical intervention. However, clinical inspection alone did not reliably identify infants with lambdoid synostosis. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of lambdoid synostosis is not always possible based on clinical inspection alone. To confirm the diagnosis imaging is recommended. There is evidence that high-resolution ultrasound can be used first-line in the future.
Authors: Jennifer Strahle; Karin M Muraszko; Steven R Buchman; Joseph Kapurch; Hugh J L Garton; Cormac O Maher Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: John C Koshy; Chuma J Chike-Obi; Daniel A Hatef; Safa E Sharabi; Adeyiza O Momoh; Robert C Dauser; Larry H Hollier Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 1.539
Authors: Yuan Liu; Natacha Kadlub; Renato da Silva Freitas; John A Persing; Charles Duncan; Joseph H Shin Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 1.046
Authors: Diana L Miglioretti; Eric Johnson; Andrew Williams; Robert T Greenlee; Sheila Weinmann; Leif I Solberg; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Douglas Roblin; Michael J Flynn; Nicholas Vanneman; Rebecca Smith-Bindman Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 16.193