Literature DB >> 24162220

Do molecular markers reflect patterns of differentiation in adaptive traits of conifers?

A Karhu1, P Hurme, M Karjalainen, P Karvonen, K Kärkkäinen, D Neale, O Savolainen.   

Abstract

We have examined patterns of variation of several kinds of molecular markers (isozymes, RFLPs of ribosomal DNA and anonymous low-copy number DNA, RAPDs and microsatellites) and an adaptive trait [date of bud set in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)]. The study included Finnish Scots pine populations (from latitude 60°N to 70°N) which experience a steep climatic gradient. Common garden experiments show that these populations are adapted to the location of their origin and genetically differentiated in adaptive quantitative traits, e.g. the date of bud set in first-year seedlings. In the northernmost population, bud set took place about 21 days earlier than in the southernmost population. Of the total variation in bud set, 36.4% was found among the populations. All molecular markers showed high levels of within-population variation, while differentiation among populations was low. Among all the studied markers, microsatellites were the most variable (He=0.77). Differences between populations were small, GST was less than 0.02. Our study suggests that molecular markers may be poor predictors of the population differentiation of quantitative traits in Scots pine, as exemplified here by bud-set date.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24162220     DOI: 10.1007/BF00225748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  14 in total

1.  Inheritance of RFLP loci in a loblolly pine three-generation pedigree.

Authors:  M E Devey; K D Jermstad; C G Tauer; D B Neale
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  ACACIA MANGIUM: A TROPICAL FOREST TREE OF THE COASTAL LOWLANDS WITH LOW GENETIC DIVERSITY.

Authors:  G F Moran; O Muona; J C Bell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know?

Authors:  N H Barton; M Turelli
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 16.830

4.  Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.

Authors:  M Nei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers.

Authors:  M Lynch; B G Milligan
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Chloroplast DNA polymorphisms in lodgepole and jack pines and their hybrids.

Authors:  D B Wagner; G R Furnier; M A Saghai-Maroof; S M Williams; B P Dancik; R W Allard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  High levels of population differentiation for mitochondrial DNA haplotypes inPinus radiata, muricata, andattenuata.

Authors:  S H Strauss; Y P Hong; V D Hipkins
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Identification of quantitative trait loci influencing wood specific gravity in an outbred pedigree of loblolly pine.

Authors:  A Groover; M Devey; T Fiddler; J Lee; R Megraw; T Mitchel-Olds; B Sherman; S Vujcic; C Williams; D Neale
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Occurrence and inheritance of microsatellites in Pinus radiata.

Authors:  D Smith; M E Devey
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.166

10.  Heterozygosity and fitness: no association in Scots pine.

Authors:  O Savolainen; P Hedrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  9 in total

1.  Segregating variation in the transcriptome: cis regulation and additivity of effects.

Authors:  Kimberly A Hughes; Julien F Ayroles; Melissa M Reedy; Jenny M Drnevich; Kevin C Rowe; Elizabeth A Ruedi; Carla E Cáceres; Ken N Paige
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Hybrid zones as a tool for identifying adaptive genetic variation in outbreeding forest trees: lessons from wild annual sunflowers (Helianthus spp.).

Authors:  Christian Lexer; Berthold Heinze; Ricardo Alia; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.558

3.  Screening of rice landraces for salinity tolerance at seedling stage through morphological and molecular markers.

Authors:  Md Nasim Ali; Lucina Yeasmin; Saikat Gantait; Rupak Goswami; Somsubhra Chakraborty
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2014-07-05

4.  Diversity analysis of selected rice landraces from West Bengal and their linked molecular markers for salinity tolerance.

Authors:  Sanghamitra Adak; Sambit Datta; Somnath Bhattacharya; Tapas Kumar Ghose; Arun Lahiri Majumder
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2020-02-21

5.  High genetic diversity at the extreme range edge: nucleotide variation at nuclear loci in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Scotland.

Authors:  W Wachowiak; M J Salmela; R A Ennos; G Iason; S Cavers
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations.

Authors:  Sally N Aitken; Sam Yeaman; Jason A Holliday; Tongli Wang; Sierra Curtis-McLane
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Comparative transcriptomics of a complex of four European pine species.

Authors:  Witold Wachowiak; Urmi Trivedi; Annika Perry; Stephen Cavers
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Contrasting patterns of genetic variation in core and peripheral populations of highly outcrossing and wind pollinated forest tree species.

Authors:  Błażej Wójkiewicz; Monika Litkowiec; Witold Wachowiak
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 3.276

9.  Genomics of Clinal Local Adaptation in Pinus sylvestris Under Continuous Environmental and Spatial Genetic Setting.

Authors:  Jaakko S Tyrmi; Jaana Vuosku; Juan J Acosta; Zhen Li; Lieven Sterck; Maria T Cervera; Outi Savolainen; Tanja Pyhäjärvi
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.154

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.