Literature DB >> 24161541

Clinical modeling--a critical analysis.

Bernd Blobel1, William Goossen, Mathias Brochhausen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modeling clinical processes (and their informational representation) is a prerequisite for optimally enabling and supporting high quality and safe care through information and communication technology and meaningful use of gathered information.
OBJECTIVES: The paper investigates existing approaches to clinical modeling, thereby systematically analyzing the underlying principles, the consistency with and the integration opportunity to other existing or emerging projects, as well as the correctness of representing the reality of health and health services.
METHODS: The analysis is performed using an architectural framework for modeling real-world systems. In addition, fundamental work on the representation of facts, relations, and processes in the clinical domain by ontologies is applied, thereby including the integration of advanced methodologies such as translational and system medicine.
RESULTS: The paper demonstrates fundamental weaknesses and different maturity as well as evolutionary potential in the approaches considered. It offers a development process starting with the business domain and its ontologies, continuing with the Reference Model-Open Distributed Processing (RM-ODP) related conceptual models in the ICT ontology space, the information and the computational view, and concluding with the implementation details represented as engineering and technology view, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The existing approaches reflect at different levels the clinical domain, put the main focus on different phases of the development process instead of first establishing the real business process representation and therefore enable quite differently and partially limitedly the domain experts' involvement.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Architectural framework; Clinical models; Data elements; Knowledge representation; Ontologies

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24161541     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Literature Review of Agents Applied in Healthcare.

Authors:  David Isern; Antonio Moreno
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Special Topic Interoperability and EHR: Combining openEHR, SNOMED, IHE, and Continua as approaches to interoperability on national eHealth.

Authors:  Mate Beštek; Dalibor Stanimirović
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Clinical Informatics Researcher's Desiderata for the Data Content of the Next Generation Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Timothy I Kennell; James H Willig; James J Cimino
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Using NLP in openEHR archetypes retrieval to promote interoperability: a feasibility study in China.

Authors:  Bo Sun; Fei Zhang; Jing Li; Yicheng Yang; Xiaolin Diao; Wei Zhao; Ting Shu
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Clinical malaria diagnosis: rule-based classification statistical prototype.

Authors:  Francis Bbosa; Ronald Wesonga; Peter Jehopio
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.