Literature DB >> 24161522

Primary stability of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under dynamic compression-shear loading in human tibiae.

Thomas M Grupp1, Matthias F Pietschmann, Melanie Holderied, Christian Scheele, Christian Schröder, Volkmar Jansson, Peter E Müller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of a single- ("implant only") versus a double-layer ("implant & bone") cementing technique on the primary stability of unicompartmental tibial plateaus under dynamic compression-shear loading conditions in human tibiae.
METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen human knees of a mean donor age of 72.3 years were used to perform medial UKA under a less invasive parapatellar surgical approach. The tibiae were divided into two groups of matched pairs based on comparable trabecular bone mineral density. To assess the primary stability, a new method based on a combination of dynamic compression-shear testing, kinematic analysis of the tibial plateau migration relative to the bone and evaluation of the cement layer by CT-scans and fragments cut through the implant-cement-bone interface in the frontal plane was introduced.
FINDINGS: For the "implant only" cementation technique the mean load to failure was 2600 (SD 675) N and for "implant & bone" it was 2820 (SD 915) N. Between the final load level at failure and the bone mineral density a significant correlation was found for the groups "implant only" (r(s) = 0.875) and "implant & bone" (r(s) = 0.907).
INTERPRETATION: From our observations, we conclude that there is no significant difference between a single- ("implant only") and double-layer ("implant & bone") cementing technique in the effect on the primary stability of unicompartmental tibia plateaus, in terms of failure load, correlation between final load at failure and bone mineral density, migration characteristics, cement layer thickness and penetration depth.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cementing technique; Dynamic compression-shear testing; Primary stability; Tibial plateau; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24161522     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Modern unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Tips and tricks].

Authors:  F von Knoch; U Munzinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Influence of bone density on morphologic cement penetration in minimally invasive tibial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an in vitro cadaver study.

Authors:  Christian B Scheele; Matthias F Pietschmann; Christian Schröder; Igor Lazic; Thomas M Grupp; Peter E Müller
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Impact of a double-layer cementing technique on the homogeneity of cementation and the generation of loose bone cement fragments in tibial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian B Scheele; Matthias F Pietschmann; Christian Schröder; Christian Suren; Thomas M Grupp; Peter E Müller
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Cementing technique for primary knee arthroplasty: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anders M Refsum; Uy V Nguyen; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Birgitte Espehaug; Anne M Fenstad; Regina K Lein; Peter Ellison; Paul J Høl; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Does tibial design modification improve implant stability for total knee arthroplasty? An experimental cadaver study.

Authors:  Sebastian Jaeger; Marvin Eissler; Martin Schwarze; Mareike Schonhoff; J Philippe Kretzer; Rudi G Bitsch
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 4.410

6.  Accuracy of a non-invasive CT-based measuring technique for cement penetration depth in human tibial UKA.

Authors:  Christian B Scheele; Peter E Müller; Christian Schröder; Thomas Grupp; Volkmar Jansson; Matthias F Pietschmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 1.930

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.