Literature DB >> 24161421

Is biological subtype prognostic of locoregional recurrence risk in women with pT1-2N0 breast cancer treated with mastectomy?

Pauline T Truong1, Betro T Sadek2, Maria F Lesperance3, Cheryl S Alexander4, Mina Shenouda2, Rita Abi Raad2, Alphonse G Taghian2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine locoregional and distant recurrence (LRR and DR) in women with pT1-2N0 breast cancer according to approximated subtype and clinicopathologic characteristics. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two independent datasets were pooled and analyzed. The study participants were 1994 patients with pT1-2N0M0 breast cancer, treated with mastectomy without radiation therapy. The patients were classified into 1 of 5 subtypes: luminal A (ER+ or PR+/HER 2-/grade 1-2, n=1202); luminal B (ER+ or PR+/HER 2-/grade 3, n=294); luminal HER 2 (ER+ or PR+/HER 2+, n=221); HER 2 (ER-/PR-/HER 2+, n=105) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (ER-/PR-/HER 2-, n=172).
RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 4.3 years. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) LRR were 1.8% in luminal A, 3.1% in luminal B, 1.7% in luminal HER 2, 1.9% in HER 2, and 1.9% in TNBC cohorts (P=.81). The 5-year KM DR was highest among women with TNBC: 1.8% in luminal A, 5.0% in luminal B, 2.4% in luminal HER 2, 1.1% in HER 2, and 9.6% in TNBC cohorts (P<.001). Among 172 women with TNBC, the 5-year KM LRR were 1.3% with clear margins versus 12.5% with close or positive margins (P=.04). On multivariable analysis, factors that conferred higher LRR risk were tumors>2 cm, lobular histology, and close/positive surgical margins.
CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year risk of LRR in our pT1-2N0 cohort treated with mastectomy was generally low, with no significant differences observed between approximated subtypes. Among the subtypes, TNBC conferred the highest risk of DR and an elevated risk of LRR in the presence of positive or close margins. Our data suggest that although subtype alone cannot be used as the sole criterion to offer postmastectomy radiation therapy, it may reasonably be considered in conjunction with other clinicopathologic factors including tumor size, histology, and margin status. Larger cohorts and longer follow-up times are needed to define which women with node-negative disease have high postmastectomy LRR risks in contemporary practice.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24161421     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

1.  Impact of an In Situ Component on Outcome After In-Breast Tumor Recurrence in Patients Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy.

Authors:  James Laird; Benjamin Lok; Chun Siu; Oren Cahlon; Atif J Khan; Beryl McCormick; Simon N Powell; Hiram Cody; Hannah Yong Wen; Alice Ho; Lior Z Braunstein
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Mastectomy alone for pT1-2 pN0-1 breast cancer patients: when postmastectomy radiotherapy is indicated.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Leonardi; Ida Rosalia Scognamiglio; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Giovanni Corso; Patrick Maisonneuve; Samantha Dicuonzo; Damaris Patricia Rojas; Maria Alessia Zerella; Anna Morra; Marianna Alessandra Gerardi; Mattia Zaffaroni; Alessandra De Scalzi; Antonia Girardi; Francesca Magnoni; Emilia Montagna; Cristiana Iuliana Fodor; Viviana Enrica Galimberti; Paolo Veronesi; Roberto Orecchia; Roberto Pacelli
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Identification of Risk Factors for Locoregional Recurrence in Breast Cancer Patients with Nodal Stage N0 and N1: Who Could Benefit from Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy?

Authors:  Eunjin Jwa; Kyung Hwan Shin; Hyeon Woo Lim; So-Youn Jung; Seeyoun Lee; Han-Sung Kang; EunSook Lee; Young Hee Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Possible benefits from post-mastectomy radiotherapy in node-negative breast cancer patients: a multicenter analysis in Korea (KROG 14-22).

Authors:  Hae Jin Park; Kyung Hwan Shin; Jin Ho Kim; Seung Do Ahn; Su Ssan Kim; Yong Bae Kim; Won Park; Yeon-Joo Kim; Hyun Soo Shin; Jin Hee Kim; Sun Young Lee; Kyubo Kim; Kyung Ran Park; Bae Kwon Jeong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-15

5.  The Benefit of Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy in ypN0 Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy According to Molecular Subtypes.

Authors:  Won Kyung Cho; Won Park; Doo Ho Choi; Yong Bae Kim; Jin Ho Kim; Su Ssan Kim; Kyubo Kim; Jin Hee Kim; Sung-Ja Ahn; Sun Young Lee; Jeongshim Lee; Sang-Won Kim; Jeanny Kwon; Ki Jung Ahn
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.588

6.  Can a subgroup at high risk for LRR be identified from T1-2 breast cancer with negative lymph nodes after mastectomy? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gongling Peng; Zhuohui Zhou; Ming Jiang; Fan Yang
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 7.  Personalization in Modern Radiation Oncology: Methods, Results and Pitfalls. Personalized Interventions and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Cynthia Aristei; Elisabetta Perrucci; Emanuele Alì; Fabio Marazzi; Valeria Masiello; Simonetta Saldi; Gianluca Ingrosso
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Established and Validated Novel Nomogram for Predicting Prognosis of Post-Mastectomy pN0-1 Breast Cancer without Adjuvant Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Wei-Xiang Qi; Lu Cao; Cheng Xu; Shengguang Zhao; Jiayi Chen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 9.  Clinical decision making in postmastectomy radiotherapy in node negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Barrientos; Suraj Samtani; Michael Frelinghuysen; Camilo Sotomayor; Juan Guillermo Gormaz; Mauricio Burotto
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2018-09-26

10.  Outcomes Following Salvage Radiation and Systemic Therapy for Isolated Locoregional Recurrence of Breast Cancer after Mastectomy: Impact of Constructed Biologic Subtype.

Authors:  Xiaofang Wang; Jinli Ma; Xin Mei; Zhaozhi Yang; Xiaoli Yu; Xiaomao Guo; Zhen Zhang; Zhimin Shao
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.375

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.