Literature DB >> 24161380

Prioritizing agricultural pesticides used in South Africa based on their environmental mobility and potential human health effects.

James Michael Dabrowski1, Justinus Madimetja Shadung, Victor Wepener.   

Abstract

South Africa is the largest user of pesticides in sub-Saharan Africa and many studies have highlighted the occurrence of pesticides in water resources. Poor management of water treatment facilities in combination with a relatively high dependency on untreated water from boreholes and rivers creates the potential for exposure of human communities to pesticides and their associated health effects. Pesticide use, physicochemical and toxicity data was therefore used to prioritize pesticides in terms of their potential risk to human health. After eliminating pesticides used in very low quantities, four indices were used to prioritize active ingredients applied in excess of 1000 kg per annum; the quantity index (QI) which ranked pesticides in terms of the quantity of their use; the toxicity potential index (TP) which ranked pesticides according to scores derived for their potential to cause five health effects (endocrine disruption, carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, mutagenicity and neurotoxicity); hazard potential index (HP) which multiplied the TP by an exposure potential score determined by the GUS index for each pesticide (to provide an indication of environmental hazard); and weighted hazard potential (WHP), which multiplied the HP for a pesticide by the ratio of its use to the total use of all pesticides in the country. The top 25 pesticides occurring in each of these indices were identified as priority pesticides, resulting in a combined total of 69 priority pesticides. A principal component analysis identified the indices that were most important in determining why a specific pesticide was included in the final priority list. As crop specific application pesticide use data was available it was possible to identify crops to which priority pesticides were applied to. Furthermore it was possible to prioritize crops in terms of the specific pesticide applied to the crop (by expressing the WHP as a ratio of the total amount of pesticide applied to the crop to the total use of all pesticides applied in the country). This allows for an improved spatial assessment of the use of priority pesticides. The methodology applied here provides a first level of basic, important information that can be used to develop monitoring programmes, identify priority areas for management interventions and to investigate optimal mitigation strategies.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crops; Pesticides; Prioritization; Risks; South Africa

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24161380     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  11 in total

1.  A polyurethane-based thin film for solid phase microextraction of pyrethroid insecticides.

Authors:  Xianbin Zhu; Rimao Hua; Dong Zhang; Xiangwei Wu; Yi Wang; Jiaying Xue
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.833

2.  Individual and combined toxic effects of herbicide atrazine and three insecticides on the earthworm, Eisenia fetida.

Authors:  Yanhua Wang; Xuehua An; Weifeng Shen; Liezhong Chen; Jinhua Jiang; Qiang Wang; Leiming Cai
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Joint acute toxicity of the herbicide butachlor and three insecticides to the terrestrial earthworm, Eisenia fetida.

Authors:  Yanhua Wang; Tao Cang; Ruixian Yu; Shenggan Wu; Xinju Liu; Chen Chen; Qiang Wang; Leiming Cai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Diversity of the Bacterial Microbiota of Anopheles Mosquitoes from Binh Phuoc Province, Vietnam.

Authors:  Chung T Ngo; Sara Romano-Bertrand; Sylvie Manguin; Estelle Jumas-Bilak
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Endocrine Disruptors and Health Effects in Africa: A Call for Action.

Authors:  Maria S Bornman; Natalie H Aneck-Hahn; Christiaan de Jager; Gesina M Wagenaar; Hindrik Bouwman; Irene E J Barnhoorn; Sean M Patrick; Laura N Vandenberg; Andreas Kortenkamp; Bruce Blumberg; Sarah Kimmins; Bernard Jegou; Jacques Auger; Joseph DiGangi; Jerrold J Heindel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Worldwide Regulations of Standard Values of Pesticides for Human Health Risk Control: A Review.

Authors:  Zijian Li; Aaron Jennings
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Evaluation of Gonadal Alterations in a Population Environmentally Exposed to a Mixture of Endocrine Active Pesticides.

Authors:  Mar Requena-Mullor; Angeles Navarro-Mena; Ruqiong Wei; Olga López-Guarnido; David Lozano-Paniagua; Raquel Alarcon-Rodriguez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Pesticide Research on Environmental and Human Exposure and Risks in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Samuel Fuhrimann; Chenjie Wan; Elodie Blouzard; Adriana Veludo; Zelda Holtman; Shala Chetty-Mhlanga; Mohamed Aqiel Dalvie; Aggrey Atuhaire; Hans Kromhout; Martin Röösli; Hanna-Andrea Rother
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Occurrence of selected endocrine disrupting compounds in the eastern cape province of South Africa.

Authors:  Adebayo I Farounbi; Nosiphiwe P Ngqwala
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Temporal variation of pesticide mixtures in rivers of three agricultural watersheds during a major drought in the Western Cape, South Africa.

Authors:  Lou Curchod; Christelle Oltramare; Marion Junghans; Christian Stamm; Mohamed Aqiel Dalvie; Martin Röösli; Samuel Fuhrimann
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2019-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.