Kalé Z Kponee1, Michael Siegel, David H Jernigan. 1. Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The mixing of alcoholic beverages with caffeine has been identified as a public health problem among college students; however, little is known about the consumption of such drinks among younger adolescents. We estimated the prevalence of caffeinated alcoholic beverage (CAB) use among a wide age range of underage drinkers, examined differences in traditional (i.e. self-mixed alcoholic beverages with soda, coffee and tea) and non-traditional CAB use (pre-mixed caffeinated alcoholic beverages or self-mixed alcoholic beverages with energy drinks or energy shots) among underage drinkers by age and other demographic characteristics, and examined differences in hazardous drinking behavior between CAB and non-CAB users. METHODS: We used an existing Internet panel maintained by Knowledge Networks, Inc. to assess the use of pre-mixed and self-mixed CABs in the past 30 days among a national sample of 1031 youth drinkers age 13-20. We conducted logistic regression analyses to estimate the relationship between traditional and non-traditional CAB use and risky drinking behavior as well as adverse outcomes of drinking, while controlling for age, gender, race/ethnicity, income, and general risk-taking (seat belt use). RESULTS: The overall prevalence of CAB use in the sample of underage drinkers was 52.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.4%-57.4%). CAB prevalence was 48.4% among 13-15 year-old drinkers, 45.3% among 16-18 year-old drinkers, and 58.4% among 19-20 year-old drinkers. After controlling for other variables, we found a continuum of risk with non-traditional CAB use most significantly associated with binge drinking (odds ratio [OR]=6.3), fighting (OR=4.4), and alcohol-related injuries (OR=5.6). CONCLUSIONS: The problem of caffeinated alcoholic beverage use is not restricted to college-aged youth. The prevalence of CAB use among underage drinkers is higher than previously thought and begins in early adolescence. Adolescents who consume CABs, and particularly non-traditional CABs, are at increased risk of adverse outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The mixing of alcoholic beverages with caffeine has been identified as a public health problem among college students; however, little is known about the consumption of such drinks among younger adolescents. We estimated the prevalence of caffeinated alcoholic beverage (CAB) use among a wide age range of underage drinkers, examined differences in traditional (i.e. self-mixed alcoholic beverages with soda, coffee and tea) and non-traditional CAB use (pre-mixed caffeinated alcoholic beverages or self-mixed alcoholic beverages with energy drinks or energy shots) among underage drinkers by age and other demographic characteristics, and examined differences in hazardous drinking behavior between CAB and non-CAB users. METHODS: We used an existing Internet panel maintained by Knowledge Networks, Inc. to assess the use of pre-mixed and self-mixed CABs in the past 30 days among a national sample of 1031 youth drinkers age 13-20. We conducted logistic regression analyses to estimate the relationship between traditional and non-traditional CAB use and risky drinking behavior as well as adverse outcomes of drinking, while controlling for age, gender, race/ethnicity, income, and general risk-taking (seat belt use). RESULTS: The overall prevalence of CAB use in the sample of underage drinkers was 52.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.4%-57.4%). CAB prevalence was 48.4% among 13-15 year-old drinkers, 45.3% among 16-18 year-old drinkers, and 58.4% among 19-20 year-old drinkers. After controlling for other variables, we found a continuum of risk with non-traditional CAB use most significantly associated with binge drinking (odds ratio [OR]=6.3), fighting (OR=4.4), and alcohol-related injuries (OR=5.6). CONCLUSIONS: The problem of caffeinated alcoholic beverage use is not restricted to college-aged youth. The prevalence of CAB use among underage drinkers is higher than previously thought and begins in early adolescence. Adolescents who consume CABs, and particularly non-traditional CABs, are at increased risk of adverse outcomes.
Authors: Amelia M Arria; Kimberly M Caldeira; Sarah J Kasperski; Kathryn B Vincent; Roland R Griffiths; Kevin E O'Grady Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2010-11-12 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Sionaldo Eduardo Ferreira; Marco Túlio de Mello; Sabine Pompéia; Maria Lucia Oliveira de Souza-Formigoni Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Dennis L Thombs; Ryan J O'Mara; Miranda Tsukamoto; Matthew E Rossheim; Robert M Weiler; Michele L Merves; Bruce A Goldberger Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Timothy Heeren; Erika M Edwards; J Michael Dennis; Sergei Rodkin; Ralph W Hingson; David L Rosenbloom Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2007-12-21 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Jonathan Howland; Damaris J Rohsenow; J Todd Arnedt; Caleb A Bliss; Sarah K Hunt; Tamara Vehige Calise; Timothy Heeren; Michael Winter; Caroline Littlefield; Daniel J Gottlieb Journal: Addiction Date: 2010-12-06 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Mary M Sweeney; Steven E Meredith; Daniel P Evatt; Roland R Griffiths Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2017-01-20 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Eric A Miller; Lewis Berman; Audie Atienza; Deirdre Middleton; Ronaldo Iachan; Robert Tortora; John Boyle Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Jana Holubcikova; Peter Kolarcik; Andrea Madarasova Geckova; Eva Joppova; Jitse P van Dijk; Sijmen A Reijneveld Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Sarah P Roberts; Michael B Siegel; William DeJong; Craig S Ross; Timothy Naimi; Alison Albers; Margie Skeer; David L Rosenbloom; David H Jernigan Journal: Addict Res Theory Date: 2015-06-04
Authors: Kira Bailey; Michael T Amlung; David H Morris; Mason H Price; Curtis Von Gunten; Denis M McCarthy; Bruce D Bartholow Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 4.530