Literature DB >> 24161187

Consenting in the dark: choose your own deception.

Rachel Zuraw1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 24161187     DOI： 10.1080/15265161.2013.840016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN： 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Minimizing sample bias due to stigmatized behaviours: the representativeness of participants in a cohort study of alcohol in pregnancy.

Authors:  David Tappin; Daniel Mackay; Lucy Reynolds; Niamh Fitzgerald
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.612

2.  Deception in research is morally problematic … and so too is not using it morally: reply to open peer commentaries on "the use of deception in public health behavioral intervention trials: a case study of three online alcohol trials".

Authors:  Jim McCambridge; Kypros Kypri; Preben Bendtsen; John Porter
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.