Literature DB >> 2416117

The relative translation efficiencies of reovirus messenger RNAs.

R K Gaillard, W K Joklik.   

Abstract

The relative translation efficiencies of reovirus messenger RNAs were measured by infecting BHK cells with serotype 1, 2, or 3 virus and measuring the rate of formation of each viral protein species and the amount of each viral single-stranded (ss) RNA species present in the infected cells throughout the multiplication cycle. The translation efficiency of each ssRNA species was then calculated as a percentage of the species that was translated most efficiently. The relative translation efficiencies of the various ssRNA species did not change significantly during the multiplication cycle and cognate mRNA species of serotype 1, 2, and 3 virus were generally translated with similar efficiencies. However, the relative translation efficiencies of the individual ssRNA species differed greatly. The most efficiently translated ssRNA species was usually species s4, followed by species m2 which, on average, was translated about two-thirds as efficiently as species s4. Species s2 and s3 were translated slightly less than one-half as efficiently as species s4; species m3, l2, and l3 one-quarter to one-third as efficiently; and species s1 one-twentieth to one-tenth as efficiently. Finally, species l1 and m1 were translated very inefficiently under all conditions; their translation efficiencies were usually no more than 1% of that of species s4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2416117     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(85)90136-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virology        ISSN: 0042-6822            Impact factor:   3.616


  8 in total

1.  Reovirus nonstructural protein muNS binds to core particles but does not inhibit their transcription and capping activities.

Authors:  T J Broering; A M McCutcheon; V E Centonze; M L Nibert
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Engineering recombinant reoviruses with tandem repeats and a tetravirus 2A-like element for exogenous polypeptide expression.

Authors:  Aleksander A Demidenko; Joseph N Blattman; Negin N Blattman; Philip D Greenberg; Max L Nibert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Translation of reovirus RNA species m1 can initiate at either of the first two in-frame initiation codons.

Authors:  M R Roner; L A Roner; W K Joklik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Reovirus reverse genetics: Incorporation of the CAT gene into the reovirus genome.

Authors:  M R Roner; W K Joklik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The molecular basis of viral oncolysis: usurpation of the Ras signaling pathway by reovirus.

Authors:  J E Strong; M C Coffey; D Tang; P Sabinin; P W Lee
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Formation of the factory matrix is an important, though not a sufficient function of nonstructural protein mu NS during reovirus infection.

Authors:  Michelle M Arnold; Kenneth E Murray; Max L Nibert
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.616

7.  The multi-functional reovirus σ3 protein is a virulence factor that suppresses stress granule formation and is associated with myocardial injury.

Authors:  Yingying Guo; Meleana M Hinchman; Mercedes Lewandrowski; Shaun T Cross; Danica M Sutherland; Olivia L Welsh; Terence S Dermody; John S L Parker
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  Virus susceptibility of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and detection of viral contaminations by adventitious agent testing.

Authors:  Andreas Berting; Maria R Farcet; Thomas R Kreil
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.530

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.