OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the genotype/phenotype relationship between siblings with identical USH2A pathologic mutations and the consequent audiologic phenotypes, in particular degree of hearing loss (HL). Decade audiograms were also compared among two groups of affected subjects with different mutations of USH2A. DESIGN: DNA samples from patients with Usher syndrome type II were analysed. The audiological features of patients and affected siblings with USH2A mutations were also examined to identify genotype-phenotype correlations. STUDY SAMPLE: Genetic and audiometric examinations were performed in 18 subjects from nine families with Usher syndrome type IIA. RESULTS: Three different USH2A mutations were identified in the affected subjects. Both similarities and differences of the auditory phenotype were seen in families with several affected siblings. A variable degree of hearing loss, ranging from mild to profound, was observed among affected subjects. No significant differences in hearing thresholds were found the group of affected subjects with different pathological mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that mutations in the USH2A gene and the resulting phenotype are probably modulated by other variables, such as modifying genes, epigenetics or environmental factors which may be of importance for better understanding the etiology of Usher syndrome.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the genotype/phenotype relationship between siblings with identical USH2A pathologic mutations and the consequent audiologic phenotypes, in particular degree of hearing loss (HL). Decade audiograms were also compared among two groups of affected subjects with different mutations of USH2A. DESIGN: DNA samples from patients with Usher syndrome type II were analysed. The audiological features of patients and affected siblings with USH2A mutations were also examined to identify genotype-phenotype correlations. STUDY SAMPLE: Genetic and audiometric examinations were performed in 18 subjects from nine families with Usher syndrome type IIA. RESULTS: Three different USH2A mutations were identified in the affected subjects. Both similarities and differences of the auditory phenotype were seen in families with several affected siblings. A variable degree of hearing loss, ranging from mild to profound, was observed among affected subjects. No significant differences in hearing thresholds were found the group of affected subjects with different pathological mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that mutations in the USH2A gene and the resulting phenotype are probably modulated by other variables, such as modifying genes, epigenetics or environmental factors which may be of importance for better understanding the etiology of Usher syndrome.
Authors: Kevin T Booth; Hela Azaiez; Kimia Kahrizi; Allen C Simpson; William T A Tollefson; Christina M Sloan; Nicole C Meyer; Mojgan Babanejad; Fariba Ardalani; Sanaz Arzhangi; Michael J Schnieders; Hossein Najmabadi; Richard J H Smith Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Christine Neuhaus; Tobias Eisenberger; Christian Decker; Sandra Nagl; Cornelia Blank; Markus Pfister; Ingo Kennerknecht; Cornelie Müller-Hofstede; Peter Charbel Issa; Raoul Heller; Bodo Beck; Klaus Rüther; Diana Mitter; Klaus Rohrschneider; Ute Steinhauer; Heike M Korbmacher; Dagmar Huhle; Solaf M Elsayed; Hesham M Taha; Shahid M Baig; Heidi Stöhr; Markus Preising; Susanne Markus; Fabian Moeller; Birgit Lorenz; Kerstin Nagel-Wolfrum; Arif O Khan; Hanno J Bolz Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 2.183
Authors: M Stemerdink; B García-Bohórquez; R Schellens; G Garcia-Garcia; E Van Wijk; J M Millan Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Alessandro Iannaccone; Carmen C Brewer; Peiyao Cheng; Jacque L Duncan; Maureen G Maguire; Isabelle Audo; Allison R Ayala; Paul S Bernstein; Gavin M Bidelman; Janet K Cheetham; Richard L Doty; Todd A Durham; Robert B Hufnagel; Mark H Myers; Katarina Stingl; Wadih M Zein Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 2.578