| Literature DB >> 24160306 |
Masafumi Yagi1, Toshiya Yamamoto, Sachiko Isobe, Hideki Hirakawa, Satoshi Tabata, Koji Tanase, Hiroyasu Yamaguchi, Takashi Onozaki.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic linkage maps are important tools for many genetic applications including mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs), identifying DNA markers for fingerprinting, and map-based gene cloning. Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) is an important ornamental flower worldwide. We previously reported a random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-based genetic linkage map derived from Dianthus capitatus ssp. andrezejowskianus and a simple sequence repeat (SSR)-based genetic linkage map constructed using data from intraspecific F2 populations; however, the number of markers was insufficient, and so the number of linkage groups (LGs) did not coincide with the number of chromosomes (x = 15). Therefore, we aimed to produce a high-density genetic map to improve its usefulness for breeding purposes and genetic research.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24160306 PMCID: PMC3870981 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-734
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Number and type of loci, genetic distance and marker density for refined 85P map
| | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | ||||||||||
| 85P_1 | B1 | 48 | 17 | 10 | 9 | 12 | 31 | 111.9 | 0.43 | 12 |
| 85P_2 | B2 | 16 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 97.1 | 0.16 | 7 |
| 85P_3 | B3 | 38 | 17 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 21 | 70.2 | 0.54 | 10 |
| 85P_4 | B4 | 39 | 21 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 18 | 73.9 | 0.53 | 14 |
| 85P_5 | B5 | 24 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 14 | 64.6 | 0.37 | 4 |
| 85P_6 | B6 | 29 | 18 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 11 | 72.1 | 0.40 | 5 |
| 85P_7 | B7 | 27 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 15 | 66.2 | 0.41 | 7 |
| 85P_8 | B8 | 36 | 18 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 18 | 66.3 | 0.54 | 8 |
| 85P_9 | B9 | 25 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 16 | 65.1 | 0.38 | 3 |
| 85P_10 | B10 | 32 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 22 | 56.1 | 0.57 | 6 |
| 85P_11 | B11 | 19 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 81.6 | 0.23 | 4 |
| 85P_12 | B12 | 28 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 19 | 52.1 | 0.54 | 8 |
| 85P_13 | B13 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 33.0 | 0.55 | 13 |
| 85P_14-1 | B14 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 23.2 | 0.30 | 6 |
| 85P_14-2 | B16 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 18.4 | 0.38 | 5 |
| 85P_15-1 | B15 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 10.1 | 1.29 | 11 |
| 85P_15-2 | no linkage group | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7.7 | 0.78 | 2 |
| Total | 412 | 178 | 62 | 65 | 107 | 234 | 969.6 | 0.42 | 125 | |
Figure 1Construction of genetic linkage maps and QTL analysis for bacterial wilt (CBW) resistance and anthocyanin pigmentation contents in petals (CAP) in carnation. Two populations were used for the 85P population, which was derived from a cross between line 85–11 and ‘Pretty Favvare’, and the NP population, which was derived from a cross between ‘Carnation Nou No.1’ and ‘Pretty Favvare’. Linkage groups (LGs) were designated as 85P_1 to 85P_15-2 for the 85P map, and as NP_1 to NP_15 for the NP map. Genetic distances (cM) and SSR loci are listed on the left and right sides of each LG, respectively. Distorted segregation is indicated by a significant P value in the chi-square test: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. Published loci previously reported by Yagi et al. [14,15] are underlined. SSR loci common to both maps are indicated in red and connected with lines. STS loci designed by De Benedetti et al. [20] are shown in blue. Boxes indicate QTL regions with LOD values greater than thresholds (in Table 3). Tightly linked markers identified in previous reports [14,15] are indicated in bold. Single flower locus in Onozaki et al. [18] is shown as “d” on LG NP_15.
QTL analysis for bacterial wilt resistance (CBW) and flower anthocyanin pigmentation contents (CAP) in carnation
| 85P_4 | 44.0 | CES1161 | GS0163 | 24.3 | 63.5 | 3.7 | |
| NP_4 | 21.9 | OR19 | WG44 | 22.1 | 59.0 | 2.7 | |
| NP_13 | 63.4 | WB8501 | WB62 | 2.8 | 4.8 | 2.7 | |
| NP_4 | 6.5 | BT45 | OR19 | 6.1 | 19.7 | 2.7 | |
| NP_10 | 24.2 | WF0102 | GS0265 | 5.3 | 17.2 | 2.7 | |
*Thresholds were determined by 1,000 permutation tests using WinQTL cartographer software.
Number and type of loci, genetic distance and marker density for the refined NP map
| | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NP_1 | A7, A10 | 30 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 19 | 90.6 | 0.33 |
| NP_2 | | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 11 | 46.3 | 0.24 |
| NP_3 | Lower region of A1 | 26 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 13 | 67.3 | 0.39 |
| NP_4 | A6 | 41 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 19 | 59.5 | 0.69 |
| NP_5 | A4 | 17 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 66.1 | 0.26 |
| NP_6 | Upper region of A1 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 44.3 | 0.34 |
| NP_7 | A5 | 24 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 78.5 | 0.31 |
| NP_8 | A12 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 106.6 | 0.14 |
| NP_9 | A8 | 24 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 51.0 | 0.47 |
| NP_10 | A9 | 20 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 58.2 | 0.34 |
| NP_11 | A13, A15 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 64.7 | 0.25 |
| NP_12 | A11, A14 | 20 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 42.9 | 0.47 |
| NP_13 | A2 | 32 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 17 | 93.1 | 0.34 |
| NP_14 | A3 | 33 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 80.7 | 0.41 |
| NP_15 | A16 | 24 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 19 | 28.5 | 0.84 |
| Total | 348 | 137 | 10 | 9 | 80 | 3 | 14 | 4 | 78 | 13 | 192 | 978.3 | 0.36 | |