INTRODUCTION: Obesity is an important public health problem related to a higher risk of death from chronic degenerative diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and several types of cancer. In epidemiological studies of big sample size, only self-reported weight and height can be collected for feasibility reasons and body mass index (BMI) estimates may be questioned. OBJECTIVES: In this study we compare self-reported and measured weight, height and BMI in a mostly young population of university students, and explore factors associated with discrepancies between self-reported and measured data. METHODS: In the period 2006-2012, 628 University students (476 women) from health sciences subject gave consent to participate in this study. Self-reported weight and height were collected by questionnaire and compared with weight and height measured afterward in health exams wearing light clothes and using standardized protocols. The validity of self-reported anthropometric estimates was explored by correlation coefficients and sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and kappa to detect measured overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²). Multiple linear regression was used to explore the factors related to the discrepancies between self-reported and measured data. RESULTS: The mean of self-reported weight, height and BMI was 62.5 kg, 167.6 cm and 22.1 kg/m² and the mean of measured data was 62.6 kg, 167.4 cm y 22.2 kg/m² respectively. Correlations between self-reported and measured data were r = 0.97 for weight, 0.96 for height and 0.95 for BMI. The sensitivity to detect overweight (IMC ≥ 25 kg/m²) using self-reported data was 81.0%, the specificity was 98.5%, the predictive value was 90.6% and the kappa index was 0.75. The discrepancy between measured and self-reported weight, height and BMI was associated with a higher age, and a higher sleeping time was also associated to discrepancies in self-reported and measured height. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the self-reported weight and BMI may underestimate the true weight and BMI, and self-reported height overestimate, the validity of self-reported anthropometric measures is adequate to use be used in epidemiological studies among young people with a high educational level.
INTRODUCTION:Obesity is an important public health problem related to a higher risk of death from chronic degenerative diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and several types of cancer. In epidemiological studies of big sample size, only self-reported weight and height can be collected for feasibility reasons and body mass index (BMI) estimates may be questioned. OBJECTIVES: In this study we compare self-reported and measured weight, height and BMI in a mostly young population of university students, and explore factors associated with discrepancies between self-reported and measured data. METHODS: In the period 2006-2012, 628 University students (476 women) from health sciences subject gave consent to participate in this study. Self-reported weight and height were collected by questionnaire and compared with weight and height measured afterward in health exams wearing light clothes and using standardized protocols. The validity of self-reported anthropometric estimates was explored by correlation coefficients and sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and kappa to detect measured overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²). Multiple linear regression was used to explore the factors related to the discrepancies between self-reported and measured data. RESULTS: The mean of self-reported weight, height and BMI was 62.5 kg, 167.6 cm and 22.1 kg/m² and the mean of measured data was 62.6 kg, 167.4 cm y 22.2 kg/m² respectively. Correlations between self-reported and measured data were r = 0.97 for weight, 0.96 for height and 0.95 for BMI. The sensitivity to detect overweight (IMC ≥ 25 kg/m²) using self-reported data was 81.0%, the specificity was 98.5%, the predictive value was 90.6% and the kappa index was 0.75. The discrepancy between measured and self-reported weight, height and BMI was associated with a higher age, and a higher sleeping time was also associated to discrepancies in self-reported and measured height. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the self-reported weight and BMI may underestimate the true weight and BMI, and self-reported height overestimate, the validity of self-reported anthropometric measures is adequate to use be used in epidemiological studies among young people with a high educational level.
Authors: Alyaa A Masaad; Ayesha M Yusuf; Ayman Z Shakir; Maryam S Khan; Sharfa Khaleel; Leila Cheikh Ismail; Mo'ez Al-Islam E Faris; Haitham A Jahrami; Nitin Shivappa; James R Hebert; Ahmed S Bahammam Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2020-08-22 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Eleni Kintziou; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Vasiliki Kefala; Thomas Rosemann; Beat Knechtle Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Eva María Navarrete-Muñoz; Laura Torres-Collado; Desirée Valera-Gran; Sandra Gonzalez-Palacios; Laura María Compañ-Gabucio; Sergio Hernández-Sánchez; Manuela García-de-la-Hera Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Ana Ballesta-Castillejos; Juan Gomez-Salgado; Julian Rodriguez-Almagro; Inmaculada Ortiz-Esquinas; Antonio Hernandez-Martinez Journal: Int Breastfeed J Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 3.461