Literature DB >> 24159555

Instability at Short Tandem Repeats in Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines.

Jae-Eun Lee1, Eun-Jung Hong, Ji-Hyun Kim, So Youn Shin, Young-Youl Kim, Bok-Ghee Han.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Epstein Barr virus (EBV)-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) are a useful biological resource, however, genomic variations can happen during the generation and immortalization processes of LCLs. The purpose of this study was to identify genomic variations in LCL DNA compared with matched blood DNA using short tandem repeats (STRs) analysis.
METHODS: We analyzed 15 STRs with blood DNA and their matched LCL DNA samples from 6645 unrelated healthy individuals.
RESULTS: Mutations (such as repeat variations and triallelic patterns) of 15 STR loci were detected in 612 LCL DNAs (9.2% of total) without mutations in their matched blood DNA. The repeat variations of 15 STRs were detected in 526 LCL DNAs (mutation rate = 0.0792) and triallelic patterns were identified in 123 (mutation rate = 0.0185). Among 15 STRs, the most common repeat variations (n = 214, mutation rate = 0.0322) and triallelic patterns (n = 17, mutation rate = 0.0026) were found at FGA locus.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that mutations in STRs can occur during generation and immortalization of LCLs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lymphoblastoid cell lines; short tandem repeats

Year:  2013        PMID: 24159555      PMCID: PMC3767104          DOI: 10.1016/j.phrp.2013.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect        ISSN: 2210-9099


Introduction

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) are a biological resource that is widely used in various research fields such as human genetics, immunology, pharmacogenomics, and toxicogenomics. Screening for toxicological effects of environmental toxicants and drugs using animal models or humans has concerns including high cost burden, time-consuming tasks, bioethics, and safety [1]. For this reason, many animal cell models have been widely used for pharmacological and toxicological research. LCLs are a model system that can assess various toxicants and drug-induced toxicity, as well as study the genetics of response to these. LCLs also have the advantage of being able to provide an unlimited DNA or RNA source for identification of disease-associated genetic factors [2]. For example, LCL samples from Parkinson's disease patients were used to identify mutation of parkin (PRKN) [3] and DJ-1 [4] genes. With the development of next-generation sequencing technology, whole genome and exome sequencing has been carried out using a large number of LCL samples [5]. LCLs are generated by a transformation process by which human B lymphocytes are infected with EBV. Thus, genomic alterations can occur in LCLs during their generation and immortalization processes, but little is known about the genomic instability in LCLs. Previous studies showed genomic variations in LCLs compared to their matched blood samples through genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis [6,7]. Copy number variation was observed in LCLs [8]. Genomic alterations in LCLs are minimal, however, these can influence the results of genome-wide association studies [6]. In this study, we identified genomic alterations in LCLs compared with their matched blood samples, using short tandem repeats (STRs) analysis.

Materials and Methods

Population

The National Biobank of Korea has collected a large number of DNA samples and performed STR analysis for quality control of DNA samples. For this study, we used STR data of blood DNA and matched LCL DNA from 6645 unrelated healthy individuals of the Ansan and Ansung cohort in Korea.

DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was isolated with blood and LCL samples from 6645 individuals using Gentra Puregene Blood kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

STR analysis

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for 15 STR loci (CSF1P0, D2S1338, D3S1358, D5S818, D7S820, D8S1179, D13S317, D16S539, D18S51, D19S433, D21S11, FGA, TH01, TPOX, and vWA) and amelogenin, the gender marker, was performed with genomic DNA using the AmpFlSTR Identifiler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) commercial kit, following the user's manual. PCR amplicons were separated and genotyped using the ABI PRISM 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and all allele fragment sizes were determined using GeneMapper ID 3.2 software.

Results

We analyzed 15 STRs (CSF1P0, D2S1338, D3S1358, D5S818, D7S820, D8S1179, D13S317, D16S539, D18S51, D19S433, D21S11, FGA, TH01, TPOX, and vWA) in blood DNA and matched LCL DNA from 6645 individuals. Through comparative analysis of STR data in blood and LCL DNA, we identified mutations of 15 STR loci in 612 LCL DNAs (9.2% of total) without mutations in their matched blood DNA. These mutations included repeat variations (such as single- or multi-repeat changes and repeat gains or losses) and triallelic patterns of STRs. The repeat variations were observed in 526 LCL DNAs (mutation rate = 0.0792) and triallelic patterns were identified in 123 (mutation rate = 0.0185) (Table 1). Thirty-seven of all LCL DNAs with triallelic patterns also showed the repeat variations. STR data of 86 LCL DNAs showed triallelic patterns without repeat variations. Among 15 STRs, the most common repeat variations (n = 214, mutation rate = 0.0322) and triallelic patterns (n = 17, mutation rate = 0.0026) were found at FGA locus.
Table 1

Mutation data of STRs analyzed from blood and LCL DNA samples of 6645 individuals

STR markersRepeat variations at STRs
Triallelic patterns at STRs
Number of LCLs with mutationsMutation rateNumber of LCLs with mutationsMutation rate
D8S11791650.0248140.0021
D21S111590.0239120.0018
D7S8201860.028060.0009
CSF1PO1630.0245100.0015
D3S13581470.022120.0003
TH011500.022610.0002
D13S3171820.027430.0005
D16S5391740.026240.0006
D2S13381820.027460.0009
D5S8181610.024280.0012
FGA2140.0322170.0026
D19S4331960.029580.0012
vWA1700.0256160.0024
TPOX1240.018750.0008
D18S511940.0292170.0026
Total5260.07921230.0185

LCL = lymphoblastoid cell line; STR = single tandem repeat.

Discussion

Instability of genomic DNA can occur in LCLs through EBV transformation during generation and immortalization. Genomic alterations in LCLs have been confirmed using various genome analysis tools such as SNP genotyping and copy number variation analysis [6-8]. Chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 30 of 268 LCLs from the HapMap project using karyotyping and SNP genotyping [8]. Chromosomes 9, 12, and X displayed a tendency toward trisomy, in particular. Furthermore, somatic deletions were detected in LCLs from father/mother–child pairs when SNP genotyping was performed after removing these abnormal chromosomes. In this study, we identified mutations (including single- or multi-repeat changes, repeat gains or losses, and triallelic patterns) of 15 STR loci in 612 of 6645 LCL DNAs (9.2%) via comparative analysis with STR data of blood DNA and matched LCL DNA from 6645 unrelated healthy individuals. In previous, somatic mutations were investigated with DNA samples from 1,730–1,764 father-son pairs which confirmed in paternity by various DNA markers via Y-STRs analysis [9]. The 84 mutations were identified in all 29,792 17 Y-STRs data of father–son pairs (mutation rate = 0.0028). Triallelic patterns of STRs were detected at D21S11 and FGA loci of patients with Down syndrome [10] and oral cancer [11], respectively. This showed that mutations of STRs can happen in cell transformation processes, although the mechanism is unknown. In conclusion, our data showed that mutations of STRs can occur during generation and immortalization of LCLs.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Currently available in vitro methods used in the regulatory toxicology.

Authors:  Manfred Liebsch; Horst Spielmann
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 4.372

2.  DJ-1 mutations are a rare cause of recessively inherited early onset parkinsonism mediated by loss of protein function.

Authors:  P J Lockhart; S Lincoln; M Hulihan; J Kachergus; K Wilkes; G Bisceglio; D C Mash; M J Farrer
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Allelic alterations at the STR markers in the buccal tissue cells of oral cancer patients and the oral epithelial cells of healthy betel quid-chewers: an evaluation of forensic applicability.

Authors:  Chung-Yen Pai; Ling-Ling Hsieh; Chun-Wei Tsai; Fu-Shyan Chiou; Chiou-Herr Yang; Ban-Dar Hsu
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Global variation in copy number in the human genome.

Authors:  Richard Redon; Shumpei Ishikawa; Karen R Fitch; Lars Feuk; George H Perry; T Daniel Andrews; Heike Fiegler; Michael H Shapero; Andrew R Carson; Wenwei Chen; Eun Kyung Cho; Stephanie Dallaire; Jennifer L Freeman; Juan R González; Mònica Gratacòs; Jing Huang; Dimitrios Kalaitzopoulos; Daisuke Komura; Jeffrey R MacDonald; Christian R Marshall; Rui Mei; Lyndal Montgomery; Kunihiro Nishimura; Kohji Okamura; Fan Shen; Martin J Somerville; Joelle Tchinda; Armand Valsesia; Cara Woodwark; Fengtang Yang; Junjun Zhang; Tatiana Zerjal; Jane Zhang; Lluis Armengol; Donald F Conrad; Xavier Estivill; Chris Tyler-Smith; Nigel P Carter; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Charles Lee; Keith W Jones; Stephen W Scherer; Matthew E Hurles
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing.

Authors:  Gonçalo R Abecasis; David Altshuler; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Richard M Durbin; Richard A Gibbs; Matt E Hurles; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Comprehensive mutation analysis of 17 Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat polymorphisms included in the AmpFlSTR Yfiler PCR amplification kit.

Authors:  Miriam Goedbloed; Mark Vermeulen; Rixun N Fang; Maria Lembring; Andreas Wollstein; Kaye Ballantyne; Oscar Lao; Silke Brauer; Carmen Krüger; Lutz Roewer; Rüdiger Lessig; Rafal Ploski; Tadeusz Dobosz; Lotte Henke; Jürgen Henke; Manohar R Furtado; Manfred Kayser
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 7.  Utility of lymphoblastoid cell lines.

Authors:  L Sie; S Loong; E K Tan
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Clinical, 18F-dopa PET, and genetic analysis of an ethnic Chinese kindred with early-onset parkinsonism and parkin gene mutations.

Authors:  Ruey-Meei Wu; Din-E Shan; Chen-Ming Sun; Ren-Shyan Liu; Wuh-Liang Hwu; Chun-Hwei Tai; Jennifer Hussey; Andrew West; Katrina Gwinn-Hardy; John Hardy; Judy Chen; Matt Farrer; Sarah Lincoln
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.338

9.  Genome-wide SNP assay reveals structural genomic variation, extended homozygosity and cell-line induced alterations in normal individuals.

Authors:  Javier Simon-Sanchez; Sonja Scholz; Hon-Chung Fung; Mar Matarin; Dena Hernandez; J Raphael Gibbs; Angela Britton; Fabienne Wavrant de Vrieze; Elizabeth Peckham; Katrina Gwinn-Hardy; Anthony Crawley; Judith C Keen; Josefina Nash; Digamber Borgaonkar; John Hardy; Andrew Singleton
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Fidelity of SNP array genotyping using Epstein Barr virus-transformed B-lymphocyte cell lines: implications for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Joshua T Herbeck; Geoffrey S Gottlieb; Kim Wong; Roger Detels; John P Phair; Charles R Rinaldo; Lisa P Jacobson; Joseph B Margolick; James I Mullins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Authentication of M14 melanoma cell line proves misidentification of MDA-MB-435 breast cancer cell line.

Authors:  Christopher Korch; Erin M Hall; Wilhelm G Dirks; Margaret Ewing; Mark Faries; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Steven Robinson; Douglas Storts; Jacqueline A Turner; Ying Wang; Edward C Burnett; Lyn Healy; Douglas Kniss; Richard M Neve; Raymond W Nims; Yvonne A Reid; William A Robinson; Amanda Capes-Davis
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 7.396

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.