Literature DB >> 24158973

Differential immunoglobulin class-mediated responses to components of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle in systemic lupus erythematosus and mixed connective tissue disease.

A Mesa1, J A Somarelli, W Wu, L Martinez, M B Blom, E L Greidinger, R J Herrera.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to determine whether patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) possess differential IgM- and IgG-specific reactivity against peptides from the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (U1 snRNP).
METHODS: The IgM- and IgG-mediated responses against 15 peptides from subunits of the U1 snRNP were assessed by indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) in sera from patients with SLE and MCTD and healthy individuals (n = 81, 41, and 31, respectively). Additionally, 42 laboratory tests and 40 clinical symptoms were evaluated to uncover potential differences. Binomial logistic regression analyses (BLR) were performed to construct models to support the independent nature of SLE and MCTD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves corroborated the classification power of the models.
RESULTS: We analyzed IgM and IgG anti-U1 snRNP titers to classify SLE and MCTD patients. IgG anti-U1 snRNP reactivity segregates SLE and MCTD from nondisease controls with an accuracy of 94.1% while IgM-specific anti-U1 snRNP responses distinguish SLE from MCTD patients with an accuracy of 71.3%. Comparison of the IgG and IgM anti-U1 snRNP approach with clinical tests used for diagnosing SLE and MCTD revealed that our method is the best classification tool of those analyzed (p ≤ 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our IgM anti-U1 snRNP system along with lab tests and symptoms provide additional molecular and clinical evidence to support the hypothesis that SLE and MCTD may be distinct syndromes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (U1 snRNP); autoimmune disorders; classification criteria; immunoglobulin M (IgM); mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24158973      PMCID: PMC3875166          DOI: 10.1177/0961203313508444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lupus        ISSN: 0961-2033            Impact factor:   2.911


  40 in total

Review 1.  Key autoantigens in SLE.

Authors:  G Riemekasten; B H Hahn
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  M C Hochberg
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1997-09

3.  Comparative study of 4 diagnosis criteria sets for mixed connective tissue disease in patients with anti-RNP antibodies. Autoimmunity Group of the Hospitals of Toulouse.

Authors:  J M Amigues; A Cantagrel; M Abbal; B Mazieres
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 4.  Does mixed connective tissue disease exist? Yes.

Authors:  Martin Aringer; Günter Steiner; Josef S Smolen
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.670

5.  Predominance of IgM anti-U1RNP antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  P G Vlachoyiannopoulos; A Guialis; G Tzioufas; H M Moutsopoulos
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1996-06

6.  Improved serological differentiation between systemic lupus erythematosus and mixed connective tissue disease by use of an SmD3 peptide-based immunoassay.

Authors:  M Mahler; L M Stinton; M J Fritzler
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-01

7.  IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: negative association with nephritis. SLE Study Group.

Authors:  T Witte; K Hartung; C Sachse; T Matthias; M Fricke; H Deicher; J R Kalden; H J Lakomek; H H Peter; R E Schmidt
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  Clinical features and race-specific incidence/prevalence rates of systemic lupus erythematosus in a geographically complete cohort of patients.

Authors:  N D Hopkinson; M Doherty; R J Powell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  [Clinical and serologic course of patients with mixed connective tissue disease].

Authors:  F J López-Longo; J Fernández; I Monteagudo; M Rodríguez-Mahou; A I Sánchez-Atrio; T Pérez; M Escalona; C M González; N Lapointe; L Carreño
Journal:  Rev Clin Esp       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.556

10.  IgM anti-A and D SnRNP proteins and IgM anti-dsDNA are closely associated in SLE sera.

Authors:  W Zhang; M Reichlin
Journal:  Clin Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1995-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Can SLE classification rules be effectively applied to diagnose unclear SLE cases?

Authors:  A Mesa; M Fernandez; W Wu; G Narasimhan; E L Greidinger; D K Mills
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.911

Review 2.  The impact of anti-U1-RNP positivity: systemic lupus erythematosus versus mixed connective tissue disease.

Authors:  Alina Dima; Ciprian Jurcut; Cristian Baicus
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Diagnosis and risk stratification in patients with anti-RNP autoimmunity.

Authors:  M F Carpintero; L Martinez; I Fernandez; A C Garza Romero; C Mejia; Y J Zang; R W Hoffman; E L Greidinger
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 2.911

4.  The diagnostic challenge of patients with anti-U1-RNP antibodies.

Authors:  Ines Elhani; Kathy Khoy; Delphine Mariotte; Elisabeth Comby; Christian Marcelli; Brigitte Le Mauff; Alexandra Audemard-Verger; Jonathan Boutemy; Gwénola Maigné; Nicolas Martin Silva; Achille Aouba; Hubert de Boysson
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.580

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.