INTRODUCTION: Although homeless individuals smoke at an alarmingly high rate, few smoking cessation clinical trials have focused on this vulnerable population. Little is known about recruitment efforts and suitable eligibility criteria for tobacco control research in homeless populations. METHODS: The aim of this article is to describe the recruitment, eligibility, and enrollment of homeless smokers who participated in the Power to Quit smoking study, a randomized smoking cessation clinical trial funded by the National Institutes of Health. The study compared motivational interviewing and standard counseling while participants received an 8-week treatment of the nicotine patch. RESULTS:Working with local emergency shelters, a total of 839 adult smokers were screened for study eligibility, 580 of whom (69.1%) met eligibility criteria. Of those eligible, 430 (74.1%) returned for randomization. Those who returned for randomization were older and more likely to have a phone number compared with eligible participants not enrolled. The most common reasons for exclusion included exhaled carbon monoxide levels less than or equal to 5 parts per million (indicating nonsmoking status), use of smoking cessation aid during the past 30 days, and not meeting the study definition of homelessness. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of these factors may help researchers tailor criteria that accurately identify and include homeless smokers in future research.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Although homeless individuals smoke at an alarmingly high rate, few smoking cessation clinical trials have focused on this vulnerable population. Little is known about recruitment efforts and suitable eligibility criteria for tobacco control research in homeless populations. METHODS: The aim of this article is to describe the recruitment, eligibility, and enrollment of homeless smokers who participated in the Power to Quit smoking study, a randomized smoking cessation clinical trial funded by the National Institutes of Health. The study compared motivational interviewing and standard counseling while participants received an 8-week treatment of the nicotine patch. RESULTS: Working with local emergency shelters, a total of 839 adult smokers were screened for study eligibility, 580 of whom (69.1%) met eligibility criteria. Of those eligible, 430 (74.1%) returned for randomization. Those who returned for randomization were older and more likely to have a phone number compared with eligible participants not enrolled. The most common reasons for exclusion included exhaled carbon monoxide levels less than or equal to 5 parts per million (indicating nonsmoking status), use of smoking cessation aid during the past 30 days, and not meeting the study definition of homelessness. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of these factors may help researchers tailor criteria that accurately identify and include homeless smokers in future research.
Authors: Sharon E Connor; Robert L Cook; Mary I Herbert; Stephen M Neal; Jennifer T Williams Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Kate Goldade; Guy-Lucien Whembolua; Janet Thomas; Sara Eischen; Hongfei Guo; John Connett; Don Des Jarlais; Ken Resnicow; Lillian Gelberg; Greg Owen; Jon Grant; Jasjit S Ahluwalia; Kolawole S Okuyemi Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Malaika N Woods; Kari Jo Harris; Matthew S Mayo; Delwyn Catley; Monica Scheibmeir; Jasjit S Ahluwalia Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: Samuel A Ball; Patricia Cobb-Richardson; Adrian J Connolly; Cesar T Bujosa; Thomas W O'neall Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2005 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Billie Bonevski; Laura Twyman; Chris Paul; Catherine D'Este; Robert West; Mohammad Siahpush; Christopher Oldmeadow; Kerrin Palazzi; Jamie Bryant; Ashleigh Guillaumier Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 2.692