Literature DB >> 24157022

Role of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in living-donor right liver harvest.

T Y Ha1, S Hwang, C S Ahn, K H Kim, D B Moon, G W Song, D H Jung, G C Park, J M Namgoong, C S Park, Y H Park, H W Park, S H Kang, B H Jung, S-G Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The cosmetic aspects of abdominal skin incisions are a matter of concern for both live liver donors and surgeons. We performed a prospective comparative study on the use of minilaparotomy to perform right liver graft harvests with and without hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS).
METHODS: Young donors were indicated for surgery using minilaparotomy with or without HALS. In the non-HALS group (n = 20), a 10-12-cm-long right subcostal incision was used for right liver graft harvest. In the HALS group (n = 20), an 8-cm-sized right subcostal incision was used for hand assistance and 3 laparoscopic holes made for manipulation. The retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) was initially laparoscopically dissected while using air inflation. The skin incision was extended to 10-12 cm, and then hilar dissection and hepatic transection were performed through the skin incision.
RESULTS: In all 40 donors in the study cohort, safe uneventful harvesting of the right liver grafts was successfully achieved through the minilaparotomy incisions. The HALS group required an additional 30 minutes for laparoscopic preparation and dissection compared with the non-HALS group. HALS facilitated retrohepatic IVC dissection, and the remaining part of the surgery was the same as that for minimal-incision surgery. The minimal skin incision for the delivery of the liver from the abdomen was an average 10 cm for grafts <500 g and 12 cm for grafts ≥700 g. Compared with the patient profiles, there were no differences regarding donor age, body mass index, graft weight, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative increase in peak liver enzymes, total hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: HALS facilitates the performance of donor hepatectomy with the use of a minimal incision, which probably allows for a wider selection of living donors.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24157022     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.08.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  12 in total

1.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted hybrid living donor hepatectomy: a comparison with the conventional open procedure.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kitajima; Toshimi Kaido; Taku Iida; Satoru Seo; Kojiro Taura; Yasuhiro Fujimoto; Kohei Ogawa; Etsuro Hatano; Hideaki Okajima; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  A review of current status of living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Gil-Chun Park; Gi-Won Song; Deok-Bog Moon; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 3.  Donor safety in live donor laparoscopic liver procurement: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Bekheit; Philipe-Abrahim Khafagy; Petru Bucur; Khaled Katri; Ahmed Elgendi; Wael Nabil Abdel-Salam; Eric Vibert; El-Said El-Kayal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open living donor hepatectomy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuye Gao; Wu Wu; Chunyu Liu; Tao Liu; Heng Xiao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 5.  Laparoscopic liver resection: wedge resections to living donor hepatectomy, are we heading in the right direction?

Authors:  P Thomas Cherian; Ashish Kumar Mishra; Palaniappen Kumar; Vijayant Kumar Sachan; Anand Bharathan; Gadiyaram Srikanth; Baiju Senadhipan; Mohamad S Rela
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Laparoscopic liver resection: Experience based guidelines.

Authors:  Fabricio Ferreira Coelho; Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger; Gilton Marques Fonseca; Raphael Leonardo Cunha Araújo; Vagner Birk Jeismann; Marcos Vinícius Perini; Renato Micelli Lupinacci; Ivan Cecconello; Paulo Herman
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-01-27

7.  Surgical outcomes following laparoscopic major hepatectomy for various liver diseases.

Authors:  Sung-Hwa Kang; Ki-Hun Kim; Min-Ho Shin; Young-In Yoon; Wan-Jun Kim; Dong-Hwan Jung; Gil-Chun Park; Tae-Yong Ha; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure in High-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score Patients.

Authors:  D-B Moon; S-G Lee; W-H Kang; G-W Song; D-H Jung; G-C Park; H-D Cho; E-K Jwa; W-J Kim; T-Y Ha; H-J Kim
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 9.  Evolution and revolution of laparoscopic liver resection in Japan.

Authors:  Hironori Kaneko; Yuichiro Otsuka; Yoshihisa Kubota; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

Review 10.  Laparoscopic living-donor hepatectomy: Review of its current status.

Authors:  Shigeru Marubashi; Hiroaki Nagano
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.