Literature DB >> 24156649

Budgetary impact on a U.S. health plan adopting abiraterone acetate plus prednisone for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Sonja Sorensen1, Lorie Ellis, Ying Wu, Valerie Hutchins, John E Linnehan, Mekré Senbetta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abiraterone acetate, an androgen biosynthesis inhibitor, received FDA approval in 2011 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who have received prior chemotherapy containing docetaxel.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the projected budgetary impact of adopting abiraterone for mCRPC patients from a U.S. health plan perspective.
METHODS: A decision analytic model compared mCRPC treatment cost before and after abiraterone acetate adoption based on a hypothetical 1,000,000-member plan. Plan mCRPC prevalence was derived from prostate cancer incidence reported in U.S. epidemiology statistics and disease progression data from published trials. Market shares for comparator mCRPC treatments (prednisone alone; cabazitaxel + prednisone; mitoxantrone + prednisone; docetaxel retreatment + prednisone) were derived from market research simulation. Abiraterone + prednisone uptake (8% - scenario 1 to 55% - scenario 3) was based on assumptions for illustrative purposes. Treatment costs were computed using prescribing information, treatment duration from phase III trials, and drug costs considering common U.S. cost listing and reimbursement schemes. Prevalence and costs of managing treatment-related toxicities were estimated from literature, treatment guidelines, and expert clinical opinion. The model evaluated the perspectives of a commercial payer with no Medicare beneficiaries and a commercial payer with a subset of Medicare beneficiaries. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess changing input values.
RESULTS: In each modeled scenario, 57 patients with prior docetaxel therapy received treatment for mCRPC. For the commercial perspective, the incremental per-member-per-month (PMPM) cost attributable to abiraterone ranged from $0.0019 in scenario 1 to $0.0133 in scenario 3. For the commercial/Medicare perspective, the incremental PMPM ranged from $0.0026 in scenario 1 to $0.0176 in scenario 3. The average incremental PMPM cost over 3 scenarios is $0.0112. When testing key sensitivity scenarios, the model indicated that abiraterone treatment duration and cabazitaxel market share were the main drivers of cost.
CONCLUSIONS: The model results indicate that reimbursement for abiraterone may have a neutral impact on a U.S. health plan budget given the relatively small size of the eligible prostate cancer population and expected lower toxicity-related costs as compared with chemotherapy. The sensitivity analyses addressing the components of uncertainty in the model show that the budgetary impact of abiraterone is likely low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24156649     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.9.799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm        ISSN: 1083-4087


  9 in total

Review 1.  Nanoways to overcome docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Aditya Ganju; Murali M Yallapu; Sheema Khan; Stephen W Behrman; Subhash C Chauhan; Meena Jaggi
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 18.500

Review 2.  Treatments for Metastatic Prostate Cancer (mPC): A Review of Costing Evidence.

Authors:  Jan Norum; Carsten Nieder
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  A Methodological Review of US Budget-Impact Models for New Drugs.

Authors:  Josephine Mauskopf; Stephanie Earnshaw
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective.

Authors:  Alicia K Morgans; Thomas Hutson; Alice Kai Dan Guan; David Garcia; Anna Zhou; Edward Drea; Nicholas J Vogelzang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.908

5.  Treatment-Related Healthcare Costs of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in Germany: A Claims Data Study.

Authors:  Kristine Kreis; Dirk Horenkamp-Sonntag; Udo Schneider; Jan Zeidler; Gerd Glaeske; Lothar Weissbach
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2021-06

6.  Emerging perspectives in prostate cancer: Insights from the 4th Asia Pacific Prostate Cancer Conference.

Authors:  Paul Mainwaring; Hideyuki Akaza
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2015-10-22

7.  Cost-effectiveness analyses and cost analyses in castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Grochtdreis; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Dobruschkin; Gunhild von Amsberg; Judith Dams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Identification of new EphA4 inhibitors by virtual screening of FDA-approved drugs.

Authors:  Shuo Gu; Wing-Yu Fu; Amy K Y Fu; Estella Pui Sze Tong; Fanny C F Ip; Xuhui Huang; Nancy Y Ip
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Impact of drug substitution on cost of care: an example of economic analysis of cetuximab versus panitumumab.

Authors:  Yifan Xu; Joel W Hay; Afsaneh Barzi
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2018-11-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.