BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the shear and tensile bond strength of three adhesive systems with increasing concentrations of filler for bonding brackets. MATERIALS & METHODS: The study was carried out on 120 extracted human premolars; randomly divided into six groups, three groups for shear bond strength & three for tensile bond strength, each subgroup consisting of 20 teeth; using light cured adhesive systems: Group 1: FORTIFY Unfilled, (unfilled penetrating resin) Group 2: ALITEF Low Filled (filler load 58% by weight) Group 3: PYRAMID Highly Filled (filler load greater than 80% by weight) with metal brackets (TP 256-650. TP orthodontic inc. Po.box 73,La Porte 46350,USA). RESULTS: The findings showed that in vitro tensile bond strength and shear bond strength of PYRAMID [9.88/11.46 MPa resp.] is significantly greater than ALITEFLO[5.34/9.50 MPa resp.] and FORTIFY [2.65/5.39 MPa resp.]. CONCLUSION: Using the same bracket and force mode but different adhesive filler concentrations revealed increased shear and tensile bond strength with increased filler concentration. How to cite this article: Kumar PS, Patil C, Hullal B, Putturaj KT, Sangolgi VC, Jayasudha K. A Comparative Study of the Shear and Tensile Bond Strength using three types of Direct Bonding Adhesives on Stainless Steel Brackets - An In Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(4):26-29.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the shear and tensile bond strength of three adhesive systems with increasing concentrations of filler for bonding brackets. MATERIALS & METHODS: The study was carried out on 120 extracted human premolars; randomly divided into six groups, three groups for shear bond strength & three for tensile bond strength, each subgroup consisting of 20 teeth; using light cured adhesive systems: Group 1: FORTIFY Unfilled, (unfilled penetrating resin) Group 2: ALITEF Low Filled (filler load 58% by weight) Group 3: PYRAMID Highly Filled (filler load greater than 80% by weight) with metal brackets (TP 256-650. TP orthodontic inc. Po.box 73,La Porte 46350,USA). RESULTS: The findings showed that in vitro tensile bond strength and shear bond strength of PYRAMID [9.88/11.46 MPa resp.] is significantly greater than ALITEFLO[5.34/9.50 MPa resp.] and FORTIFY [2.65/5.39 MPa resp.]. CONCLUSION: Using the same bracket and force mode but different adhesive filler concentrations revealed increased shear and tensile bond strength with increased filler concentration. How to cite this article: Kumar PS, Patil C, Hullal B, Putturaj KT, Sangolgi VC, Jayasudha K. A Comparative Study of the Shear and Tensile Bond Strength using three types of Direct Bonding Adhesives on Stainless Steel Brackets - An In Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(4):26-29.
Entities:
Keywords:
Filler Concentration; Shear Bond Strength; Tensile Bond Strength