Literature DB >> 24155604

Evaluation of the Amount of Debris extruded apically by using Conv-entional Syringe, Endovac and Ultrasonic Irrigation Technique: An In Vitro Study.

Varsha H Tambe1, Pradnya S Nagmode, Jayshree R Vishwas, Saujanya K P, Prabakar Angadi, Fareedi Mukram Ali.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the amount of debris extruded apically by using conventional syringe, Endovac & Ultrasonic irrigation. MATERIALS &
METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted mandibular premolars were selected, working length was determined and mounted in a debris and collection apparatus. The canals were prepared. After each instrument change, 1 ml. of 3% sodium hypochlorite was used as irrigation. Debris extruded apically by using conventional syringe, endovac& ultrasonic irrigation tech, was measured using the electronic balance to determine its weight and statistical analysis was performed. The mean difference between the groups was determined using statistical analysis within the groups &between the groups for equal variances.
RESULTS: Among all the groups, significantly less debris were found apically in the Endovac group (0.96) compared to conventional and ultrasonic group (1.23) syringe.
CONCLUSION: The present study showed that endovac system extrudes less amount of debris apically as compared to ultrasonic followed by conventional so incidence of flare up can be reduce by using endovac irrigation system. How to cite this article: Tambe V H, Nagmode P S, Vishwas J R, Saujanya K P, Angadi P, Ali F M. Evaluation of the Amount of Debris extruded apically by using Conventional Syringe, Endovac and Ultrasonic Irrigation Technique: An In Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(3):63-66.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apical Extrusion.; Debris; Endovac; Ultrasonic

Year:  2013        PMID: 24155604      PMCID: PMC3769864     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Oral Health        ISSN: 0976-1799


  10 in total

1.  Effect of irrigation on the production of extruded material at the root apex during instrumentation.

Authors:  J E Vande Visse; J D Brilliant
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  Quantitative evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using 3 different rotary instrumentation systems.

Authors:  Jale Tanalp; Figen Kaptan; Semih Sert; Baybora Kayahan; G Bayirl
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2005-10-14

3.  A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques.

Authors:  G L Myers; S Montgomery
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  Comparison of balanced forces, endosonic, and step-back filing instrumentation techniques: quantification of extruded apical debris.

Authors:  D J McKendry
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors.

Authors:  S Seltzer; I J Naidorf
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  Human teeth with periapical pathosis after overinstrumentation and overfilling of the root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study.

Authors:  J H Gutiérrez; C Brizuela; E Villota
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.264

7.  Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy.

Authors:  A Byström; G Sundqvist
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1981-08

Review 8.  Microbial causes of endodontic flare-ups.

Authors:  Jose F Siqueira
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.264

9.  Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy.

Authors:  José F Siqueira; Isabela N Rôças; Amauri Favieri; Andréia G Machado; Sérgio M Gahyva; Julio C M Oliveira; Ernani C Abad
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.171

10.  Apical extrusion of debris and irrigant using hand and rotary systems: A comparative study.

Authors:  Sheetal B Ghivari; Girish C Kubasad; Manoj G Chandak; Nr Akarte
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-04
  10 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Pressure alteration techniques in endodontics- a review of literature.

Authors:  Shinam Kapila Pasricha; Sameer Makkar; Pranav Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-03-01

2.  Efficacy of Different Methods for Removing Root Canal Filling Material in Retreatment - An In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Swetha Kasam; Annapoorna Ballagere Mariswamy
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-06-01

3.  Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of EndoVac with conventional irrigation needles in debris removal from root canal. An in-vivo study.

Authors:  Manisha Laxmichand Kungwani; Krishna P Prasad; Tushar Suresh Khiyani
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-07

4.  Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and self-adjusting file systems.

Authors:  Damla Ozsu; Ertugrul Karatas; Hakan Arslan; Meltem C Topcu
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-10

5.  In vitro Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using Rotary and Reciprocating Systems in Severely Curved Root Canals.

Authors:  Abbas Delvarani; Nahid Mohammadzadeh Akhlaghi; Raana Aminirad; Sohrab Tour Savadkouhi; Seyed Aliakbar Vahdati
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2017

6.  Comparative evaluation of the amount of debris extruded apically using conventional syringe, passive ultrasonic irrigation and EndoIrrigator Plus system: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Vidhi Prabhakar Shetty; Balaram Damodar Naik; Amit Kashinath Pachlag; Mahantesh Mrityunjay Yeli
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

7.  Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris with V-Taper, ProTaper Next, and the Self-adjusting File systems.

Authors:  Nishant K Vyavahare; Srinidhi Surya Raghavendra; Niranjan N Desai
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 May-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.