Literature DB >> 24152252

Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in asymptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction and nonobstructed coronary arteries.

Marko Banovic1, Vujisic-Tesic Bosiljka, Brkovic Voin, Petrovic Milan, Nedeljkovic Ivana, Popovic Dejana, Trifunovic Danijela, Nikolic Serjan.   

Abstract

AIM: Patients with moderate and severe aortic stenosis (AS) and without obstructive epicardial coronary disease have been shown to have an impairment of coronary flow reserve (CFR). We investigated the prognostic significance of CFR in predicting death during mid-to-long-term follow-up in asymptomatic patients with moderate/severe AS, preserved ejection fraction (EF), and with nonobstructed coronary arteries. METHOD AND RESULT: A total of 127 patients with moderate or severe AS (effective orifice area of 1.5 cm(2) or less), mean age 66 ± 11 were enrolled in this prospective study. The median follow-up was 32 ± 7 months. All patients had standard Doppler echo study, coronary angiography, and adenosine-stress transthoracic Doppler echo for CFR measurement. Univariate analysis showed that diabetes mellitus, CFR, aortic valve area (AVA), maximal velocity (Vmax ), mean pressure gradient (Pmean ), energy loss index (ELI), aortic valve resistance (AVR), NT-proBNP, E/E', valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva ), and stroke work loss (SWL) were associated (P < 0.05) with death. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that only Zva and CFR were independent predictors of death, with the CFR being the single strongest predictor (Table 2). Using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, the CFR value of 1.85 had the highest accuracy in predicting the death during mid-to-long-term follow-up (area under the curve; AUC 0.890, P = 0.009, sensitivity 96.3%, specificity 75%; 95% CI 0.287-0.946; Fig. 1). The Zva value of 5.52 Hg/mL per m had a sensitivity 70.0% and specificity 72.0% (AUC 0.766, 95% CI 0.587-0.946; P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that CFR has a prognostic value in patients with asymptomatic moderate or severe AS with preserved EF and nonobstructed coronary arteries.
© 2013, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; coronary flow reserve; microcirculation; predictive value

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24152252     DOI: 10.1111/echo.12404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echocardiography        ISSN: 0742-2822            Impact factor:   1.724


  8 in total

Review 1.  Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Assessment with Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography.

Authors:  Iana Simova
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2015-07

2.  Comparison of exercise testing and CMR measured myocardial perfusion reserve for predicting outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis: the PRognostic Importance of MIcrovascular Dysfunction in Aortic Stenosis (PRIMID AS) Study.

Authors:  Anvesha Singh; John P Greenwood; Colin Berry; Dana K Dawson; Kai Hogrefe; Damian J Kelly; Vijay Dhakshinamurthy; Chim C Lang; Jeffrey P Khoo; David Sprigings; Richard P Steeds; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Stefan Neubauer; Bernard Prendergast; Bryan Williams; Ruiqi Zhang; Ian Hudson; Iain B Squire; Ian Ford; Nilesh J Samani; Gerry P McCann
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  Challenges in Diagnosis and Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Srdjan Aleksandric; Marko Banovic; Branko Beleslin
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-11

4.  Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mihir A Kelshiker; Henry Seligman; James P Howard; Haseeb Rahman; Michael Foley; Alexandra N Nowbar; Christopher A Rajkumar; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Yousif Ahmad; Sayan Sen; Rasha Al-Lamee; Ricardo Petraco
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 35.855

5.  Serial changes of coronary flow reserve over one year after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Teruaki Wada; Yasutsugu Shiono; Kentaro Honda; Daisuke Higashioka; Akira Taruya; Masahiro Takahata; Suwako Fujita; Shingo Ota; Keisuke Satogami; Yuichi Ozaki; Manabu Kashiwagi; Akio Kuroi; Takashi Yamano; Kazushi Takemoto; Takashi Tanimoto; Hironori Kitabata; Yoshiharu Nishimura; Atsushi Tanaka
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 6.  The Role of Stress Echocardiography in Valvular Heart Disease.

Authors:  Rodolfo Citro; Francesca Bursi; Michele Bellino; Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.955

Review 7.  Coronary Microcirculation in Aortic Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Invasive Assessment, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jo M Zelis; Pim A L Tonino; Nico H J Pijls; Bernard De Bruyne; Richard L Kirkeeide; K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  The new clinical standard of integrated quadruple stress echocardiography with ABCD protocol.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano; Quirino Ciampi; Karina Wierzbowska-Drabik; Mădălina-Loredana Urluescu; Doralisa Morrone; Clara Carpeggiani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.062

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.