Literature DB >> 24152135

Toward disaster-resilient cities: characterizing resilience of infrastructure systems with expert judgments.

Stephanie E Chang1, Timothy McDaniels, Jana Fox, Rajan Dhariwal, Holly Longstaff.   

Abstract

Resilient infrastructure systems are essential for cities to withstand and rapidly recover from natural and human-induced disasters, yet electric power, transportation, and other infrastructures are highly vulnerable and interdependent. New approaches for characterizing the resilience of sets of infrastructure systems are urgently needed, at community and regional scales. This article develops a practical approach for analysts to characterize a community's infrastructure vulnerability and resilience in disasters. It addresses key challenges of incomplete incentives, partial information, and few opportunities for learning. The approach is demonstrated for Metro Vancouver, Canada, in the context of earthquake and flood risk. The methodological approach is practical and focuses on potential disruptions to infrastructure services. In spirit, it resembles probability elicitation with multiple experts; however, it elicits disruption and recovery over time, rather than uncertainties regarding system function at a given point in time. It develops information on regional infrastructure risk and engages infrastructure organizations in the process. Information sharing, iteration, and learning among the participants provide the basis for more informed estimates of infrastructure system robustness and recovery that incorporate the potential for interdependent failures after an extreme event. Results demonstrate the vital importance of cross-sectoral communication to develop shared understanding of regional infrastructure disruption in disasters. For Vancouver, specific results indicate that in a hypothetical M7.3 earthquake, virtually all infrastructures would suffer severe disruption of service in the immediate aftermath, with many experiencing moderate disruption two weeks afterward. Electric power, land transportation, and telecommunications are identified as core infrastructure sectors.
© 2013 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disasters; expert judgment; infrastructure; interdependencies; resilience

Year:  2013        PMID: 24152135     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  6 in total

Review 1.  Portable ultrasound in disaster triage: a focused review.

Authors:  S M Wydo; M J Seamon; S W Melanson; P Thomas; D P Bahner; S P Stawicki
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Modelling a critical infrastructure-driven spatial database for proactive disaster management: A developing country context.

Authors:  David O Baloye; Lobina G Palamuleni
Journal:  Jamba       Date:  2016-04-26

3.  Spatial Optimization of Future Urban Development with Regards to Climate Risk and Sustainability Objectives.

Authors:  Daniel Caparros-Midwood; Stuart Barr; Richard Dawson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  A spatiotemporal analysis of urban resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Yangtze River Delta.

Authors:  Xiansheng Chen; Ruisong Quan
Journal:  Nat Hazards (Dordr)       Date:  2021-01-02

5.  An experimental investigation of resilience decision making in repeated disasters.

Authors:  Noah C Dormady; Robert T Greenbaum; Kim A Young
Journal:  Environ Syst Decis       Date:  2021-06-07

6.  Prehospital Emergency Medical Services Challenges in Disaster; a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Mohamad Sorani; Sogand Tourani; Hamid Reza Khankeh; Sirous Panahi
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2018-04-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.