Literature DB >> 24152008

Consumer-resource interactions and the evolution of migration.

Devin M Drown1, Mark F Dybdahl, Richard Gomulkiewicz.   

Abstract

Theoretical studies have demonstrated that selection will favor increased migration when fitnesses vary both temporally and spatially, but it is far from clear how pervasive those theoretical conditions are in nature. Although consumer-resource interactions are omnipresent in nature and can generate spatial and temporal variation, it is unknown even in theory whether these dynamics favor the evolution of migration. We develop a mathematical model to address whether and how migration evolves when variability in fitness is determined at least in part by consumer-resource coevolutionary interactions. Our analyses show that such interactions can drive the evolution of migration in the resource, consumer, or both species and thus supplies a general explanation for the pervasiveness of migration. Over short time scales, we show the direction of change in migration rate is determined primarily by the state of local adaptation of the species involved: rates increase when a species is locally maladapted and decrease when locally adapted. Our results reveal that long-term evolutionary trends in migration rates can differ dramatically depending on the strength or weakness of interspecific interactions and suggest an explanation for the evolutionary divergence of migration rates among interacting species.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coevolution; consumer-resource interactions; local adaptation; migration

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24152008      PMCID: PMC3880135          DOI: 10.1111/evo.12194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  24 in total

1.  No sex please we're at QLE (quasi-linkage equilibrium).

Authors:  A Pomiankowski; J Bridle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Models of plant-pathogen coevolution.

Authors:  S A Frank
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Natural and sexual selection on many loci.

Authors:  N H Barton; M Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Host-parasite coevolution and selection on sex through the effects of segregation.

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 5.  A synthesis of experimental work on parasite local adaptation.

Authors:  Megan A Greischar; Britt Koskella
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Host-parasite 'Red Queen' dynamics archived in pond sediment.

Authors:  Ellen Decaestecker; Sabrina Gaba; Joost A M Raeymaekers; Robby Stoks; Liesbeth Van Kerckhoven; Dieter Ebert; Luc De Meester
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The maintenance of sex, clonal dynamics, and host-parasite coevolution in a mixed population of sexual and asexual snails.

Authors:  Jukka Jokela; Mark F Dybdahl; Curtis M Lively
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Mutating away from your enemies: the evolution of mutation rate in a host-parasite system.

Authors:  L K M'Gonigle; J J Shen; S P Otto
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  Evolution of migration in a periodically changing environment.

Authors:  F Blanquart; S Gandon
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  On the causes of selection for recombination underlying the red queen hypothesis.

Authors:  Marcel Salathé; Roger D Kouyos; Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  1 in total

1.  Host ecotype generates evolutionary and epidemiological divergence across a pathogen metapopulation.

Authors:  Anna-Liisa Laine; Jeremy J Burdon; Adnane Nemri; Peter H Thrall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.