Literature DB >> 24151266

The effect of the Oxford uncemented medial compartment arthroplasty on the bone mineral density and content of the proximal tibia.

G J Hooper1, N Gilchrist, R Maxwell, R March, A Heard, C Frampton.   

Abstract

We studied the bone mineral density (BMD) and the bone mineral content (BMC) of the proximal tibia in patients with a well-functioning uncemented Oxford medial compartment arthroplasty using the Lunar iDXA bone densitometer. Our hypothesis was that there would be decreased BMD and BMC adjacent to the tibial base plate and increased BMD and BMC at the tip of the keel. There were 79 consecutive patients (33 men, 46 women) with a mean age of 65 years (44 to 84) with a minimum two-year follow-up (mean 2.6 years (2.0 to 5.0)) after unilateral arthroplasty, who were scanned using a validated standard protocol where seven regions of interest (ROI) were examined and compared with the contralateral normal knee. All had well-functioning knees with a mean Oxford knee score of 43 (14 to 48) and mean Knee Society function score of 90 (20 to 100), showing a correlation with the increasing scores and higher BMC and BMD values in ROI 2 in the non-implanted knee relative to the implanted knee (p = 0.013 and p = 0.015, respectively). The absolute and percentage changes in BMD and BMC were decreased in all ROIs in the implanted knee compared with the non-implanted knee, but this did not reach statistical significance. Bone loss was markedly less than reported losses with total knee replacement. There was no significant association with side, although there was a tendency for the BMC to decrease with age in men. The BMC was less in the implanted side relative to the non-implanted side in men compared with women in ROI 2 (p = 0.027), ROI 3 (p = 0.049) and ROI 4 (p = 0.029). The uncemented Oxford medial compartment arthroplasty appears to allow relative preservation of the BMC and BMD of the proximal tibia, suggesting that the implant acts more physiologically than total knee replacement. Peri-prosthetic bone loss is an important factor in assessing long-term implant stability and survival, and the results of this study are encouraging for the long-term outcome of this arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral content; Bone mineral density; Oxford unicondylar knee replacement; Proximal tibia; Uncemented

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24151266     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.31509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  3 in total

1.  The clinical outcomes of cementless unicompartmental knee replacement in patients with reduced bone mineral density.

Authors:  Hasan R Mohammad; James A Kennedy; Stephen J Mellon; Andrew Judge; Christopher A Dodd; David W Murray
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  Valgus subsidence of the tibial component in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  A D Liddle; H G Pandit; C Jenkins; P Lobenhoffer; W F M Jackson; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Finite Element Analysis of Mobile-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: The Influence of Tibial Component Coronal Alignment.

Authors:  Guang-Duo Zhu; Wan-Shou Guo; Qi-Dong Zhang; Zhao-Hui Liu; Li-Ming Cheng
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.