BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a therapeutic target in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), with gene amplification used as a selection criterion for treatment, although to the authors' knowledge the concordance between amplification and HER2 protein expression remains undefined in EAC. Furthermore, the association between HER2 and its interacting partner, human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3), is unknown yet appears to be of potential therapeutic relevance. METHODS: Patients with untreated EACs (N = 673) were analyzed for HER2 amplification and polysomy 17 by fluorescence in situ hybridization in parallel with immunohistochemistry (IHC) (IHC scores of 0-1+, 2+, and 3+). Amplification was defined as HER2/CEP17 ≥ 2. HER3 expression by IHC was analyzed in randomly selected cases (n = 224). IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization results were compared using least squares linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, 17% of the EACs (116 of 673 EACs) were HER2-amplified with an amplification frequency that was highest among IHC3+ cases (89%) and declined among IHC2+ cases (13%) and IHC0 to IHC1+ cases (4%). Among HER2-amplified cases, the level of amplification increased linearly with HER2 membranous expression (HER2/CEP17 ratio: 7.9 in IHC3+ and 5.5 in IHC2+ vs 2.8 in IHC0 to IHC1+ [P < .0001]), with 14% of amplified tumors demonstrating absent/faint expression (IHC0 to IHC1+). Polysomy 17 was not found to be associated with HER2 expression. Cytoplasmic HER3 expression was detected in 87% of tumors (195 of 224 tumors) and was found to be significantly associated with better differentiation (P < .0001). Stepwise increases in HER3 expression were associated with higher HER2 expression levels (P = .0019). CONCLUSIONS: Levels of HER2 protein expression and amplification were found to be linearly associated and highly concordant. Among amplified tumors with absent/faint expression, the level of amplification was low. Frequent expression of HER3 suggests its relevance as a therapeutic target, and its significant association with HER2 supports ongoing efforts to inhibit HER2/HER3 in patients with EAC.
BACKGROUND:Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a therapeutic target in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), with gene amplification used as a selection criterion for treatment, although to the authors' knowledge the concordance between amplification and HER2 protein expression remains undefined in EAC. Furthermore, the association between HER2 and its interacting partner, human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3), is unknown yet appears to be of potential therapeutic relevance. METHODS:Patients with untreated EACs (N = 673) were analyzed for HER2 amplification and polysomy 17 by fluorescence in situ hybridization in parallel with immunohistochemistry (IHC) (IHC scores of 0-1+, 2+, and 3+). Amplification was defined as HER2/CEP17 ≥ 2. HER3 expression by IHC was analyzed in randomly selected cases (n = 224). IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization results were compared using least squares linear regression. RESULTS: Overall, 17% of the EACs (116 of 673 EACs) were HER2-amplified with an amplification frequency that was highest among IHC3+ cases (89%) and declined among IHC2+ cases (13%) and IHC0 to IHC1+ cases (4%). Among HER2-amplified cases, the level of amplification increased linearly with HER2 membranous expression (HER2/CEP17 ratio: 7.9 in IHC3+ and 5.5 in IHC2+ vs 2.8 in IHC0 to IHC1+ [P < .0001]), with 14% of amplified tumors demonstrating absent/faint expression (IHC0 to IHC1+). Polysomy 17 was not found to be associated with HER2 expression. Cytoplasmic HER3 expression was detected in 87% of tumors (195 of 224 tumors) and was found to be significantly associated with better differentiation (P < .0001). Stepwise increases in HER3 expression were associated with higher HER2 expression levels (P = .0019). CONCLUSIONS: Levels of HER2 protein expression and amplification were found to be linearly associated and highly concordant. Among amplified tumors with absent/faint expression, the level of amplification was low. Frequent expression of HER3 suggests its relevance as a therapeutic target, and its significant association with HER2 supports ongoing efforts to inhibit HER2/HER3 in patients with EAC.
Authors: Michael F Press; Guido Sauter; Leslie Bernstein; Ivonne E Villalobos; Martina Mirlacher; Jian-Yuan Zhou; Rooba Wardeh; Yong-Tian Li; Roberta Guzman; Yanling Ma; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Angela Santiago; Jinha M Park; Alessandro Riva; Dennis J Slamon Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-12-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas Holbro; Roger R Beerli; Francisca Maurer; Magdalena Koziczak; Carlos F Barbas; Nancy E Hynes Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-07-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M Hofmann; O Stoss; D Shi; R Büttner; M van de Vijver; W Kim; A Ochiai; J Rüschoff; T Henkel Journal: Histopathology Date: 2008-04-18 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Monica M Reinholz; Amy K Bruzek; Daniel W Visscher; Wilma L Lingle; Matthew J Schroeder; Edith A Perez; Robert B Jenkins Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Si Tuen Lee-Hoeflich; Lisa Crocker; Evelyn Yao; Thinh Pham; Xander Munroe; Klaus P Hoeflich; Mark X Sliwkowski; Howard M Stern Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Tao Zuo; Lizhong Wang; Carl Morrison; Xing Chang; Huiming Zhang; Weiquan Li; Yan Liu; Yin Wang; Xingluo Liu; Michael W Y Chan; Jin-Qing Liu; Richard Love; Chang-Gong Liu; Virginia Godfrey; Rulong Shen; Tim H-M Huang; Tianyu Yang; Bae Keun Park; Cun-Yu Wang; Pan Zheng; Yang Liu Journal: Cell Date: 2007-06-14 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Zhaohui Jin; Marie Holubek; William R Sukov; Christopher A Sattler; Anne E Wiktor; Robert B Jenkins; Tsung-Teh Wu; Harry H Yoon Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Daniel V T Catenacci; Wei-Li Liao; Lei Zhao; Emma Whitcomb; Les Henderson; Emily O'Day; Peng Xu; Sheeno Thyparambil; David Krizman; Kathleen Bengali; Jamar Uzzell; Marlene Darfler; Fabiola Cecchi; Adele Blackler; Yung-Jue Bang; John Hart; Shu-Yuan Xiao; Sang Mee Lee; Jon Burrows; Todd Hembrough Journal: Gastric Cancer Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 7.370
Authors: Eva A Ebbing; Jan Paul Medema; Helene Damhofer; Sybren L Meijer; Kausilia K Krishnadath; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Maarten F Bijlsma; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-03-01
Authors: Charlotta Hedner; David Borg; Björn Nodin; Emelie Karnevi; Karin Jirström; Jakob Eberhard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240