Literature DB >> 24150726

Genetic diversity and bottleneck studies in endangered Bhutia and Manipuri pony breeds.

A K Gupta1, Mamta Chauhan, Anuradha Bhardwaj.   

Abstract

For studying the genetic diversity and bottleneck problem in Bhutia and Manipuri pony breeds of India, we analysed DNA samples of 34 Bhutia and 50 Manipuri, true to breed, ponies using 47 polymorphic microsatellite markers. All the microsatellites were observed to be highly polymorphic in nature in both Bhutia and Manipuri breeds with mean no. of alleles as 8.702 ± 0.0493 and 8.416 ± 0.0548 respectively. Genetic diversity values in terms of heterozygosity values within individual breeds were also high with very low inbreeding (Fis 0.102 and 0.055 in Bhutia and Manipuri ponies, respectively). Number of alleles in both the populations together ranged from 3 to 18 with an average of 10.851 ± 1.583 per locus. The mean effective number of alleles was observed to 5.34 ± 0.253. All loci except ASB017 and HTG004 showed high values of allele richness (>5.0). The mean observed and expected heterozygosities were 0.7159 ± 0.022, 0.7986 ± 0.011 (Levene's) and 0.7936 ± 0.011 (Nei's), respectively. The high mean values of heterozygosity indicated the presence of high genetic diversity in both the pony populations. The overall mean value of within-population inbreeding estimates (Fis) was low (0.101 ± 0.023) indicating low to moderate level of inbreeding. Bottleneck studies revealed that no recent bottleneck problem has taken place in both the populations. Both pony populations were found to be in mutation drift equilibrium. The study reveals that both the pony breeds have high diversity and timely action needs to be taken to conserve them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24150726     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-013-2813-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.316


  24 in total

1.  THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION.

Authors:  M KIMURA; J F CROW
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them.

Authors:  Derek Spielman; Barry W Brook; Richard Frankham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Microsatellite markers based genetic diversity and bottleneck studies in Zanskari pony.

Authors:  A K Gupta; Mamta Chauhan; Anuradha Bhardwaj; S N Tandon
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  The Effect of an Experimental Bottleneck upon Quantitative Genetic Variation in the Housefly.

Authors:  E H Bryant; S A McCommas; L M Combs
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT AND GENETIC VARIABILITY IN POPULATIONS.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nei; Takeo Maruyama; Ranajit Chakraborty
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.

Authors:  M Nei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Microsatellites and associated repetitive elements in the sheep genome.

Authors:  F C Buchanan; R P Littlejohn; S M Galloway; A M Crawford
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 8.  Genetic and phylogenetic analyses of endangered species.

Authors:  S J O'Brien
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  Deviations from Hardy-Weinberg proportions: sampling variances and use in estimation of inbreeding coefficients.

Authors:  A Robertson; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.

Authors:  D Botstein; R L White; M Skolnick; R W Davis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of demographic bottleneck in Indian horse and endangered pony breeds.

Authors:  A K Gupta; Mamta Chauhan; Anuradha Bhardwaj; R K Vijh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 1.166

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.