Literature DB >> 24150434

Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical outcomes after first repeat surgery versus second repeat surgery.

Risheng Xu1, Mohamad Bydon, Mohamed Macki, Rafael De la Garza-Ramos, Daniel M Sciubba, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Timothy F Witham, Ziya L Gokaslan, Ali Bydon.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study.
OBJECTIVE: To study the long-term effects of repeat cervical fusion after development of adjacent segment disease (ASD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ASD is a well-recognized development after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Although there are data on the development of ASD after ACDF, the incidence of ASD after repeat ACDF has not been well established.
METHODS: We collected 888 consecutive patients who underwent ACDF for cervical degenerative disease during a 20-year period at a single institution. Patients were followed for an average of 94.0 ± 78.1 months after the first ACDF.
RESULTS: Of the 888 patients who underwent ACDF, 108 patients developed ASD, necessitating a second cervical fusion. Among these 108 patients, 27 patients later developed recurrent ASD, requiring a third cervical fusion. Thus, in this series, the incidence of ASD after ACDF is 12.2%, statistically increasing to 25% after a second cervical fusion (P = 0.0002). Notably, ASD occurred 47.0 ± 44.9 months after the first ACDF and statistically decreased to 30.3 ± 24.9 months after a second cervical fusion (P = 0.01). Of the 77 patients who underwent a second cervical fusion via an anterior approach, 23 developed recurrent ASD requiring a third cervical fusion. In contrast, of the 31 patients who had a posteriorly approached second cervical fusion, only 4 developed recurrent ASD requiring a third cervical fusion.
CONCLUSION: We present a cohort of patients undergoing multiple sequential operations due to ASD during a 20-year period. In this series of 888 patients, the incidence of ASD development is lowest after the first ACDF. Patients who undergo a second cervical fusion develop ASD at both higher and faster rates. Moreover, patients who had a second cervical fusion via an anterior approach had a higher chance of developing recurrent ASD versus patients who had a posterior approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24150434     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

Review 1.  Revision surgery for failed cervical spine reconstruction: review article.

Authors:  John D Koerner; Christopher K Kepler; Todd J Albert
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-07-25

2.  Clinical outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without anterior cervical plating for the treatment of cervical disc herniation-a 25-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Benedikt W Burkhardt; Moritz Brielmaier; Karsten Schwerdtfeger; Joachim M Oertel
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  A minimum 2-year comparative study of autologous cancellous bone grafting versus beta-tricalcium phosphate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a rectangular titanium stand-alone cage.

Authors:  Toru Yamagata; Kentaro Naito; Hironori Arima; Masaki Yoshimura; Kenji Ohata; Toshihiro Takami
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Anterior cervical spine surgery-associated complications in a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Anastasia Tasiou; Theofanis Giannis; Alexandros G Brotis; Ioannis Siasios; Iordanis Georgiadis; Haralampos Gatos; Eleni Tsianaka; Konstantinos Vagkopoulos; Konstantinos Paterakis; Kostas N Fountas
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

5.  Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

6.  Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of rates of adjacent-level surgery to 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jetan H Badhiwala; Andrew Platt; Christopher D Witiw; Vincent C Traynelis
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-03

7.  New Classification for Clinically Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Pathology in Cervical Disc Disease.

Authors:  Srinivasan Sreeramulu Uddanapalli
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-12-08

Review 8.  Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingde Kong; Junming Cao; Linfeng Wang; Yong Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Long-term results of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion with nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 strut for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Xu Deng; Dianming Jiang; Xiaoji Luo; Ke Tang; Zenghui Zhao; Weiyang Zhong; Tao Lei; Zhengxue Quan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Commentary.

Authors:  Qing-Yi He
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.