Literature DB >> 24150264

Diagnosing malignant pleural effusions: how do we compare?

Ming Han Lim1, Jeffrey Garrettc, Lydia Mowlem, Elaine Yap.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Accurate and prompt diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is important as patients with suspected MPE often wait for many days before the diagnosis is secure. AIMS: (1) To evaluate the diagnostic yield of pleural fluid cytology for patients admitted to Middlemore Hospital (MMH) in Auckland, New Zealand with MPE between 31 May 2010-1 June 2011. (2) To document the waiting time for cytology results to be made available and whether this contributed to length of stay. (3) To evaluate whether the volume of pleural fluid analysed contributed to diagnostic yield.
METHODS: A retrospective audit of pleural fluid cytology results on 36 consecutive patients admitted to MMH with a pleural effusion which was subsequently proven to be due to malignancy. Data was obtained from hospital medical records and Web Eclair databases.
RESULTS: 54.8% (17/31) of patients had positive pleural fluid cytology. Initial pleural fluid cytology was positive in 16 (51.6%). Only 4/15 patients with negative pleural fluid cytology had a repeat aspiration (1 was positive). Median cytology turnaround time was 6.72 days, range 2.23-43.06 days. Average length of stay (ALOS) was 7.78 days, range 1.11-20.8 days. Cytology turnaround times seem shorter for inpatients and when a diagnosis of cancer is unknown but the ALOS is longer if patients have negative initial cytology and when a diagnosis of cancer is uncertain. Samples >50mL appear to have a higher diagnostic yield compared to samples less than and equal to 50mL but this was not statistically significant (77.8% to 41.2%, p=0.08).
CONCLUSION: Diagnostic yield from pleural fluid cytology at our hospital is comparable with other documented studies. ALOS appears to be influenced by a negative initial pleural fluid cytology and the uncertainty of diagnosis of cancer, not cytology turnaround time. The results suggest a more efficient diagnostic and treatment algorithm could be considered with emphasis on Day Stay investigation and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24150264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  5 in total

1.  Clinical characteristics and dose-volume histogram parameters associated with the development of pleural effusions in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Matthew P Deek; Sairaman Nagarajan; Sinae Kim; Inaya Ahmed; Shiby Paul; Eli D Scher; Matthew Listo; Andrew Chen; Joseph Aisner; Sabiha Hussain; Bruce G Haffty; Salma K Jabbour
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  The Exploration of Peptide Biomarkers in Malignant Pleural Effusion of Lung Cancer Using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Bin Xu; Chuanhao Tang; Xiaoyan Li; Haifeng Qin; Weixia Wang; Hong Wang; Zhongyuan Wang; Liangliang Li; Zhihua Li; Hongjun Gao; Kun He; Xiaoqing Liu
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.434

3.  Malignant Pleural Effusion from Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Case Report with Unusual Cytologic Findings.

Authors:  Jinyoung Jeon; Tae-Jung Kim; Hong Sik Park; Kyo-Young Lee
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2018-06-07

4.  A case report of lung adenocarcinoma with polyserous effusions as the onset symptom.

Authors:  Ping Han; Ruipin Yao; Dongxia Zhai; Chao Cheng; Fangyong Yang; Shuai Sun; Danying Zhang; Chaoqin Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Critical analysis of the utility of initial pleural aspiration in the diagnosis and management of suspected malignant pleural effusion.

Authors:  Rachel Mary Mercer; Rebecca Varatharajah; Gillian Shepherd; Qiang Lu; Olalla Castro-Añón; David J McCracken; Alexandra Dudina; Dinesh Addala; Stamatoula Tsikrika; Vineeth George; Radhika Banka; Rachelle Asciak; Maged Hassan; Robert Hallifax; Eihab O Bedawi; Janis Kay Shute; Najib M Rahman
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2020-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.