Literature DB >> 24150210

Extensive study of human insulin immunoassays: promises and pitfalls for insulin analogue detection and quantification.

Béatrice Heurtault, Nathalie Reix, Nicolas Meyer, Françoise Gasser, Marie-Josée Wendling, Charline Ratomponirina, Nathalie Jeandidier, Rémy Sapin, Arnaud Agin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the last few decades, new synthetic insulin analogues have been developed. Their measurement is of prime importance in the investigation of hypoglycaemia, but their quantification is hampered by variable cross-reactivity with many insulin assays. For clinical analysis, it has now become essential to know the potential cross-reactivity of analogues of interest.
METHODS: In this work, we performed an extensive study of insulin analogue cross-reactivity using numerous human insulin immunoassays. We investigated the cross-reactivity of five analogues (lispro, aspart, glulisine, glargine, detemir) and two glargine metabolites (M1 and M2) with 16 commercial human insulin immunoassays as a function of concentration.
RESULTS: The cross-reactivity values for insulin analogues or glargine metabolites ranged from 0% to 264%. Four assays were more specific to human insulin, resulting in negligible cross-reactivity with the analogues. However, none of the 16 assays was completely free of cross-reactivity with analogues or metabolites. The results show that analogue cross-reactivity, which varies to a large degree, is far from negligible, and should not be overlooked in clinical investigations.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has established the cross-reactivity of five insulin analogues and two glargine metabolites using 16 immunoassays to facilitate the choice of the immunoassay(s) and to provide sensitive and specific analyses in clinical routine or investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24150210     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

1.  Development of a Microsphere-Based System to Facilitate Real-Time Insulin Monitoring.

Authors:  Lindy Kahanovitz; Erkin Seker; Robert S Marks; Martin L Yarmush; Tania Konry; Steven J Russell
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-03

2.  Characteristics of fatal insulin overdoses.

Authors:  Lilli Stephenson; Corinna van den Heuvel; Melissa Humphries; Roger W Byard
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 2.456

3.  Peripheral IV Insulin Infusion Infiltration Presenting as "Insulin Resistance".

Authors:  Tiffany Y Kim; Kenneth A Woeber; Heidimarie Windham MacMaster; Robert J Rushakoff
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Effect of meal composition and alcohol consumption on postprandial glucose concentration in subjects with type 1 diabetes: a randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Alia García; Vanessa Moscardó; Agustín Ramos-Prol; Julián Díaz; Miguel Boronat; Jorge Bondia; Paolo Rossetti
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2021-10

5.  Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin and Subcutaneous Insulin Lispro in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Marshall Grant; Tim Heise; Robert Baughman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 5.577

6.  Explaining unexplained hypoglycemia: How LC-MS/MS can help.

Authors:  M T Ackermans; J Hopman; A C Heijboer; S E Siegelaar
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 7.  Proteoforms and their expanding role in laboratory medicine.

Authors:  Lauren M Forgrave; Meng Wang; David Yang; Mari L DeMarco
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2021-11-27

Review 8.  Adapting Protocols or Models for Use in Insulin-Requiring Diabetes and Islet Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Glenn M Ward; Jacqueline M Walters; Judith L Gooley; Raymond C Boston
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.555

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.