Literature DB >> 24149814

Pelvic rotation and lower extremity motion with two different front foot directions in the tennis backhand groundstroke.

Sayumi Iwamoto1, Toru Fukubayashi, Patria Hume.   

Abstract

When a tennis player steps forward to hit a backhand groundstroke in closed stance, modifying the direction of the front foot relative to the net may reduce the risk of ankle injury and increase performance. This study evaluated the relationship between pelvic rotation and lower extremity movement during the backhand groundstroke when players stepped with toes parallel to the net (Level) or with toes pointed towards the net (Net). High school competitive tennis players (eleven males and seven females, 16.8 ± 0.8 years, all right- handed) performed tennis court tests comprising five maximum speed directional runs to the court intersection line to hit an imaginary ball with forehand or backhand swings. The final backhand groundstroke for each player at the backcourt baseline was analyzed. Pelvic rotation and lower extremity motion were quantified using 3D video analysis from frontal and sagittal plane camera views reconstructed to 3D using DLT methods. Plantar flexion of ankle and supination of the front foot were displayed for both Net and Level groups during the late phase of the front foot step. The timings of the peak pelvis rotational velocity and peak pelvis rotational acceleration showed different pattern for Net and Level groups. The peak timing of the pelvis rotational velocity of the Level group occurred during the late phase of the step, suggesting an increase in the risk of inversion ankle sprain and a decrease in stroke power compared to the Net group. Key PointsRegarding the movement of the forefoot, the Net group and the Level group showed a pattern of supination-pronation-supination during the front stepping foot contact phase (FSFCP). However, the Level group showed only supination of various degrees during FSFCP.For the Net group, the maximum angular velocity of pelvis occurred in the early phase of FSFCP before impact; however, for the Level group, the maximum angular velocity of pelvis occurred in the latter phase of FSFCP after impact.The Level group players showed a potentially higher risk of inversion ankle sprain during the latter stage of FSFCP as pelvic rotation reached maximum angular velocity.The Net group may have a more effective kinetic chain during backhand groundstrokes, which ultimately enhances performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle; lower extremity movements; pelvic rotational acceleration; pelvic rotational velocity; prevention; sprains

Year:  2013        PMID: 24149814      PMCID: PMC3761834     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  10 in total

Review 1.  Incidence, severity, aetiology and prevention of sports injuries. A review of concepts.

Authors:  W van Mechelen; H Hlobil; H C Kemper
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Biomechanics of the elbow in sports.

Authors:  Jeremy Loftice; Glenn S Fleisig; Nigel Zheng; James R Andrews
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 3.  Shoulder injuries in tennis players.

Authors:  H van der Hoeven; W B Kibler
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Effects of the playing surface on plantar pressures and potential injuries in tennis.

Authors:  O Girard; F Eicher; F Fourchet; J P Micallef; G P Millet
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  The Role of Knee Positioning and Range-of-Motion on the Closed-Stance Forehand Tennis Swing.

Authors:  Steven M Nesbit; Monika Serrano; Mike Elzinga
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  A systematic review on ankle injury and ankle sprain in sports.

Authors:  Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Youlian Hong; Lap-Ki Chan; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Trunk rotation torques through the hip joints during the one- and two-handed backhand tennis strokes.

Authors:  Susumu Akutagawa; Takeji Kojima
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.337

8.  Comparison of segmental linear and angular momentum transfers in two-handed backhand stroke stances for different skill level tennis players.

Authors:  Lin-Hwa Wang; Hwai-Ting Lin; Kuo-Cheng Lo; Yung-Chun Hsieh; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 4.319

9.  Lateral ankle sprains: evaluation and treatment.

Authors:  T D Vitale; L M Fallat
Journal:  J Foot Surg       Date:  1988 May-Jun

10.  Injury surveillance at the USTA Boys' Tennis Championships: a 6-yr study.

Authors:  M R Hutchinson; R F Laprade; Q M Burnett; R Moss; J Terpstra
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.411

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Performance factors related to the different tennis backhand groundstrokes: a review.

Authors:  Cyril Genevois; Machar Reid; Isabelle Rogowski; Miguel Crespo
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.