Literature DB >> 24149792

Key factors and timing patterns in the tennis forehand of different skill levels.

Johannes Landlinger1, Stefan Lindinger, Thomas Stöggl, Herbert Wagner, Erich Müller.   

Abstract

The main purpose of the present study was to quantify and compare selected kinematic variables and their timing during the tennis forehand of different skill levels. An eight-camera 400 Hz, Vicon motion analysis system recorded kinematic data of six ATP- professionals (elite) and seven high performance (HP) players when shots were played cross court and down the line. Timing of the maximum angles, linear and angular velocities was measured prior to and after impact. A total of twelve strokes per subject were analyzed from the beginning to the end of horizontal racquet movement. Significant differences (p < 0.01) and large effect sizes were observed between elite and HP players in the timing of maximum pelvis (-0.075 ± 0.008 vs. -0.093 ± 0.012 s) and trunk angular velocities (-0.057 ± 0.004 vs. -0.075 ± 0.011 s) before impact. The elite group showed a tendency (p < 0.05) towards higher peak horizontal shoulder (3.0 ± 0.4 vs. 2.5 ± 0.4 m·s(-1)) and racquet velocities (33.1 ± 2.4 vs. 31.1 ± 1.9 m·s(-1)) compared to the HP players. Depending on the situation (cross court vs. down the line), different peak hip, racquet and separation angles were found for both groups. Similar peak values were detected between groups for maximum angular velocities and displacement of key variables that had been selected for analysis. The findings of this study can be vital for successful player development, improved performance or injury prevention. The later occurrence of maximum angular pelvis and trunk rotations were the main reasons for the tendency towards higher horizontal shoulder and racquet velocities in the elite group. Key pointsDifferent timing of maximum angular pelvis and trunk rotations separated the elite from the high performance players.The elite group tended to reach higher horizontal shoulder and racquet velocities than the high performance group.In addition to maximum angular velocities, maximum racquet, shoulder, and hip alignment angles were similar between groups.To improve the forehand performance level of their athletes, coaches should focus on proper pelvis and trunk rotation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; kinematics; proximal-to-distal sequencing; racquet speed

Year:  2010        PMID: 24149792      PMCID: PMC3761808     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  17 in total

Review 1.  Effect of endpoint conditions on position and velocity near impact in tennis.

Authors:  D Knudson; R Bahamonde
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.337

2.  System and modelling errors in motion analysis: implications for the measurement of the elbow angle in cricket bowling.

Authors:  Bruce C Elliott; Jacqueline A Alderson; Eliot R Denver
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  A three-dimensional analysis of the contributions of upper limb joint movements to horizontal racket head velocity at ball impact during tennis serving.

Authors:  Satoru Tanabe; Akira Ito
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.832

4.  The role of upper torso and pelvis rotation in driving performance during the golf swing.

Authors:  Joseph Myers; Scott Lephart; Yung-Shen Tsai; Timothy Sell; James Smoliga; John Jolly
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.337

5.  Contributions of joint rotations to racquet speed in the tennis serve.

Authors:  Brian J Gordon; Jesús Dapena
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.337

6.  Thorax and pelvis kinematics during the downswing of male and female skilled golfers.

Authors:  Sean A Horan; Kerrie Evans; Norman R Morris; Justin J Kavanagh
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Hitting a baseball: a biomechanical description.

Authors:  C M Welch; S A Banks; F F Cook; P Draovitch
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 8.  Sequential motions of body segments in striking and throwing skills: descriptions and explanations.

Authors:  C A Putnam
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Kinematics used by world class tennis players to produce high-velocity serves.

Authors:  Glenn Fleisig; Rochelle Nicholls; Bruce Elliott; Rafael Escamilla
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.832

10.  Kinematic description of elite vs. Low level players in team-handball jump throw.

Authors:  Herbert Wagner; Michael Buchecker; Serge P von Duvillard; Erich Müller
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics and learning practices associated with the tennis forehand: a review.

Authors:  Machar Reid; Bruce Elliott; Miguel Crespo
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Comparison of Muscle Onset Activation Sequences between a Golf or Tennis Swing and Common Training Exercises Using Surface Electromyography: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  John M Vasudevan; Andrew Logan; Rebecca Shultz; Jeffrey J Koval; Eugene Y Roh; Michael Fredericson
Journal:  J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp)       Date:  2016-06-15

3.  The value of technical characteristics for future performance in youth tennis players: A prospective study.

Authors:  Nikki S Kolman; Barbara C H Huijgen; Chris Visscher; Marije T Elferink-Gemser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Can the Open Stance Forehand Increase the Risk of Hip Injuries in Tennis Players?

Authors:  Caroline Martin; Anthony Sorel; Pierre Touzard; Benoit Bideau; Ronan Gaborit; Hugo DeGroot; Richard Kulpa
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-11

5.  Evaluation of Upper Limb Joint Contribution to Racket Head Speed in Elite Tennis Players Using IMU Sensors: Comparison between the Cross-Court and Inside-Out Attacking Forehand Drive.

Authors:  Bruno Pedro; Filipa João; Jerusa P R Lara; Silvia Cabral; João Carvalho; António P Veloso
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  An Enhanced Joint Hilbert Embedding-Based Metric to Support Mocap Data Classification with Preserved Interpretability.

Authors:  Cristian Kaori Valencia-Marin; Juan Diego Pulgarin-Giraldo; Luisa Fernanda Velasquez-Martinez; Andres Marino Alvarez-Meza; German Castellanos-Dominguez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.