Literature DB >> 24149452

Gender Differences and Biomechanics in the 3000M Steeplechase Water Jump.

Ian Hunter1, Bryan K Lindsay, Kassi R Andersen.   

Abstract

Since 1996, women have been competing in the 3000m steeplechase race internationally. Whenever women and men both compete in similar events with different equipment (the barriers are lower for women) consideration should be given as to how techniques should be coached differently. This study investigated the differences in water-jump technique between men and women after accounting for differences in running speed and which techniques led to maintenance of race pace through the water-jump. Eighteen men and 18 women were filmed at two major track and field meets during the 2004 season. Peak Motus 8.2 was used to digitize all seven jumps from each athlete. Various characteristics of water-jump technique were measured or calculated and compared using two multiple linear regressions (one for men and one for women) to determine which characteristics led to maintaining race pace speeds through the water jump obstacle. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine any differences between men and women in the measured characteristics of technique.Velocity through the jump divided by race pace was predicted very well by approach velocity and landing distance for men and women. Other characteristics of the movement were non-significant. Differences between genders were found in: approach velocity, take-off distance, landing distance, push-off angle, velocity through jump, and exit velocity. Men and women steeplechasers must focus on approach velocity and landing distance to complete the water-jump close to their race pace. Coaches need to consider many characteristics of technique that differ between men and women. Key pointsWomen may need to be coached differently than men in the steeplechase water jump due to different techniques required.Men and women must focus on a high approach velocity to complete the steeplechase water jump successfully.Men and women must generate a relatively long landing distance to maintain velocity and keep from having to use extra energy exiting the water pit.Women's race paces were affected more than men's by the water jump in a negative way.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Track and field; athletics; biomechanics.; hurdling; running

Year:  2008        PMID: 24149452      PMCID: PMC3761453     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  5 in total

1.  A mathematical analysis of the bioenergetics of hurdling.

Authors:  A J Ward-Smith
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.337

2.  Effect of free versus constant pace on performance and oxygen kinetics in running.

Authors:  V L Billat; J Slawinski; M Danel; J P Koralsztein
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Variables predictive of performance in elite middle-distance runners.

Authors:  W L Kenney; J L Hodgson
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Linear kinematics of the men's 110-m and women's 100-m hurdles races.

Authors:  C McDonald; J Dapena
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Steeplechase barriers affect women less than men.

Authors:  Iain Hunter; Tyler D Bushnell
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Effect of a 16-Day Altitude Training Camp on 3,000-m Steeplechase Running Energetics and Biomechanics: A Case Study.

Authors:  Jean Slawinski; François Chiron; Benjamin Millot; Adrien Taouji; Franck Brocherie
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2019-11-22

2.  Successful Pacing Profiles of Olympic Men and Women 3,000 m Steeplechasers.

Authors:  Brian Hanley; Emily L Williams
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-03-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.