Literature DB >> 24149415

Advances in paediatric strength assessment: changing our perspective on strength development.

Mark De Ste Croix1.   

Abstract

Our knowledge of the age and sex associated changes in strength during childhood and adolescence is relatively limited compared to other physiological parameters. However, those studies available on the age and sex associated change in strength are relatively consistent, especially for the lower limbs. Caution must be taken when transferring this knowledge to other muscle joints as the development in strength appears to be both muscle action and joint specific. Strength appears to increase in both boys and girls until about the age of 14 y where it begins to plateau in girls and a spurt is evident in boys. By 18 y there are few overlaps in strength between boys and girls. The exact age in which sex differences become apparent appears to be both muscle group and muscle action specific and there is a suggestion that sex differences in upper body strength occur earlier than lower body strength. What is less clear is the complex factors that contribute to the production of strength during childhood and adolescence. There are few well controlled longitudinal studies that have concurrently examined the influence of known variables using appropriate statistical techniques. Most studies have shown that maturation does not exert an independent effect when other factors, such as stature and body mass are accounted for. Also, the assumption that muscle cross-sectional area is the most important parameter in strength production does not hold when examined with other known variables. Consistently, stature appears to play a key role in strength development and this may be attributed to the strength spurt that has been linked to peak height velocity, and the muscle moment arm. Advances in technology have provided us with more accurate techniques to examine these explanatory variables but the complex interaction of neural, mechanical and muscular remains to be clearly identified from well controlled longitudinal studies. Key pointsThe age associated development in strength is attributable to changes in growth and maturation. Sex differences appear at around 14y and very few girls out perform boys in strength tests at 18y.Stature and mass appear to be important explanatory variables in the development of muscle strength. PHV is a particularly important time for maximal gains in strength during childhood.The muscle moment arm is possibly the most important factor in the development of muscle strength with age but further longitudinal studies using MRI are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Strength; children; muscle size; technology

Year:  2007        PMID: 24149415      PMCID: PMC3787279     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  42 in total

Review 1.  Assessment and interpretation of isokinetic muscle strength during growth and maturation.

Authors:  Mark De Ste Croix; Martine Deighan; Neil Armstrong
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Measurement of maximal muscle cross-sectional area of the elbow extensors and flexors in children, teenagers and adults.

Authors:  M Deighan; M De Ste Croix; C Grant; N Armstrong
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 3.  The use of isometric tests of muscular function in athletic assessment.

Authors:  G J Wilson; A J Murphy
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Eccentric and concentric torque-velocity characteristics, torque output comparisons, and gravity effect torque corrections for the quadriceps and hamstring muscles in females.

Authors:  S H Westing; J Y Seger
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  Muscular strength in children: preliminary report on objective standards.

Authors:  J Alexander; G E Molnar
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Effect of isokinetic strength-training on functional ability and walking efficiency in adolescents with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  H E MacPhail; J F Kramer
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.449

7.  Cross-sectional study of the isokinetic muscle trunk strength among school children.

Authors:  F Balagué; P Damidot; M Nordin; M Parnianpour; M Waldburger
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Strength and cross-sectional areas of reciprocal muscle groups in the upper arm and thigh during adolescence.

Authors:  H Kanehisa; S Ikegawa; N Tsunoda; T Fukunaga
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.118

9.  Training in élite young athletes (the Training of Young Athletes (TOYA) Study): injuries, flexibility and isometric strength.

Authors:  N Maffulli; J B King; P Helms
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Predictive leg strength values in immediately prepubescent and postpubescent athletes.

Authors:  G C Tabin; J R Gregg; T Bonci
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  14 in total

1.  The affordance of barrier crossing in young children exhibits dynamic, not geometric, similarity.

Authors:  Winona Snapp-Childs; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  How Young is "Too Young" to Start Training?

Authors:  Gregory D Myer; Rhodri S Lloyd; Jensen L Brent; Avery D Faigenbaum
Journal:  ACSMs Health Fit J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.364

3.  The relationship between workloads, physical performance, injury and illness in adolescent male football players.

Authors:  Tim J Gabbett; Douglas G Whyte; Timothy B Hartwig; Holly Wescombe; Geraldine A Naughton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Neuromuscular Risk Factors for Knee and Ankle Ligament Injuries in Male Youth Soccer Players.

Authors:  Paul J Read; Jon L Oliver; Mark B A De Ste Croix; Gregory D Myer; Rhodri S Lloyd
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Normalized Isometric Shoulder Strength as a Predictor of Ball Velocity in Youth Baseball Players.

Authors:  Amanda J Arnold; Charles A Thigpen; Paul F Beattie; Stacy L Fritz; Michael J Kissenberth; John M Tokish; Ellen Shanley
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-02-01

6.  Physical Persistency across Game Quarters and during Consecutive Games in Elite Junior Basketball Players.

Authors:  Rubén Portes; Rafael Manuel Navarro Barragán; Julio Calleja-González; Miguel Ángel Gómez-Ruano; Sergio Lorenzo Jiménez Sáiz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Does combined dry land strength and aerobic training inhibit performance of young competitive swimmers?

Authors:  Nuno Garrido; Daniel A Marinho; Victor M Reis; Roland van den Tillaar; Aldo M Costa; António J Silva; Mário C Marques
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  Gender's Effect on a School-Based Intervention in The Prepubertal Growth Spurt.

Authors:  Carlos Marta; Daniel Marinho; Natalina Casanova; Teresa Fonseca; Carolina Vila-Chã; Bernardete Jorge; Mikel Izquierdo; Dulce Esteves; Mário Marques
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  "It's Just Not Something We Do at School". Adolescent Boys' Understanding, Perceptions, and Experiences of Muscular Fitness Activity.

Authors:  Ashley Cox; Stuart J Fairclough; Robert J Noonan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Influences of Differing Menarche Status on Motor Capabilities of Girls, 13 To 16 Years: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Barry Gerber; Anita E Pienaar; Ankebe Kruger
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.